MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 13 · 2026-08-12 · marici.Nima · research

Boundary Pairing and Surface Lift Handoff

Record

Date: 2026-08-12

Status: corrected genus-zero boundary square; surface comparison and contact primitive remain open.

Division of labor

Entry 11 identifies the generic twisted-cohomology class J\mathsf J. Boundary naturality is a separate problem with two interfaces:

Neither interface should be hidden inside the notation I−1I^{-1}.

Exact genus-zero square

For a separating divisor or cut CC, use dual half-spaces and retain the plumbing normal line. The intended square is

HΣ+→ IΣ♭ (HΣ−)∨↓ρC+↓BCHL+⊗HR+→ IL♭⊗IR♭ (HL−⊗HR−)∨,\begin{array}{ccc} H_\Sigma^+ & \xrightarrow{\ I_\Sigma^\flat\ } & (H_\Sigma^-)^\vee\\ \downarrow\rho_C^+ && \downarrow B_C\\ H_L^+\otimes H_R^+ & \xrightarrow{\ I_L^\flat\otimes I_R^\flat\ } & (H_L^-\otimes H_R^-)^\vee, \end{array}

where the transpose boundary map is defined by

(BCa)(uL⊗uR)=Res⁡Ca ⁣(γC−(uL⊗uR)).(B_Ca)(u_L\otimes u_R) = \operatorname*{Res}_{C} a\!\left(\gamma_C^-(u_L\otimes u_R)\right).

Here γC−\gamma_C^- glues test half-objects and ρC+\rho_C^+ takes the residue of the raised half-object. Pairing compatibility is

BCIΣ♭=(IL♭⊗IR♭)ρC+.B_CI_\Sigma^\flat = (I_L^\flat\otimes I_R^\flat)\rho_C^+.

Whenever the relevant maps are invertible on the induced channel quotient, this becomes

ρC+(IΣ♭)−1=((IL♭)−1⊗(IR♭)−1)BC.\rho_C^+(I_\Sigma^\flat)^{-1} = \bigl((I_L^\flat)^{-1}\otimes(I_R^\flat)^{-1}\bigr)B_C.

Orientations, Koszul signs, the plumbing weight, and the normal line remain explicit. A scalar formula appears only after trivializing those lines.

Resonance qualification

The generic (n−3)!(n-3)!-dimensional pairing cannot simply be specialized and inverted at sC=0s_C=0. The twist is resonant there and the residue matrix has lower rank in the full nn-point space.

In a channel-adapted basis,

mn∼(sC−1ϵC(mL⊗mR)+O(1)∗∗∗),m_n \sim \begin{pmatrix} s_C^{-1}\epsilon_C(m_L\otimes m_R)+O(1)& *\\ *&* \end{pmatrix},

and hence

mn−1∼(sCϵC−1(mL−1⊗mR−1)+O(sC2)O(sC)O(sC)∗).m_n^{-1} \sim \begin{pmatrix} s_C\epsilon_C^{-1}(m_L^{-1}\otimes m_R^{-1})+O(s_C^2)&O(s_C)\\ O(s_C)&* \end{pmatrix}.

The sCs_C factor cancels the amplitude covector's pole. Index raising is monoidal on this associated channel block, not by inversion of Res⁡Cmn\operatorname{Res}_C m_n.

Three-column scalar-to-surface target

The full target is

gr⁡ZAΣscalar→ χΣ (HΣ−)∨→ (IΣ♭)−1 HΣ+,\operatorname{gr}_{Z}\mathcal A_\Sigma^{\rm scalar} \xrightarrow{\ \chi_\Sigma\ } (H_\Sigma^-)^\vee \xrightarrow{\ (I_\Sigma^\flat)^{-1}\ } H_\Sigma^+,

with vertical maps

ΔCRees,BC,ρC+.\Delta_C^{\rm Rees}, \qquad B_C, \qquad \rho_C^+.

The second square is cyclicity or boundary compatibility of the perfect pairing. The first square is the missing scalar comparison theorem:

BCχΣ=?(χL⊗χR)ΔCRees.B_C\chi_\Sigma \stackrel{?}{=} (\chi_L\otimes\chi_R)\Delta_C^{\rm Rees}.

For a normal grade rr, the Rees cut uses graded convolution rather than a same-grade tensor product:

ΔCgr⁡r=∑a+b+c=r−wCgr⁡a⊗gr⁡cηC⊗gr⁡b.\Delta_C\operatorname{gr}^{r} = \sum_{a+b+c=r-w_C} \operatorname{gr}^{a}\otimes \operatorname{gr}^{c}\eta_C\otimes \operatorname{gr}^{b}.

Derived normal data may be required when scalar degenerations are not transverse.

Cut-kernel obstruction

Even if every cut in the three-column diagram commutes, cuts do not determine a unique surface function. The solution set

{J^Σ:ΔΣJ^Σ=prescribed cuts}\left\{ \widehat{\mathsf J}_\Sigma: \mathbf\Delta_\Sigma\widehat{\mathsf J}_\Sigma = \text{prescribed cuts} \right\}

is a torsor for

KΣ=⋂Cker⁡ΔC.\mathcal K_\Sigma = \bigcap_C\ker\Delta_C.

Thus a mapping-class- and sewing-compatible primitive

ωΣ∈KΣ\omega_\Sigma\in\mathcal K_\Sigma

or a natural splitting of the total-cut sequence is additional required data. The known punctured-disk constant term already rejects the zero-primitive choice.

This is not a defect of the on-shell class [(Pf′A)2][({\rm Pf}'A)^2]. It is the expected loss of local contact information under cuts.

Internal state sewing

The BAS/KLT kernel contracts ordering indices. Channel state coevaluation is separate data of the half-object:

These are not new primitive half-integrands, but omitting them makes the gluing formula ill typed.

Concrete ownership tests

YM: six-point s123s_{123} channel

  1. Form the 6×66\times6 BAS matrix in complementary KLT bases.
  2. Construct channel residue maps R123±R_{123}^\pm.
  3. Verify

Res⁡s123=0m6=(R123−)T(m4⊗m4)R123+ \operatorname*{Res}_{s_{123}=0}m_6 = (R_{123}^-)^{\mathsf T} (m_4\otimes m_4) R_{123}^+

with the selected orientation convention. 4. Verify the leading s123(m4−1⊗m4−1)s_{123}(m_4^{-1}\otimes m_4^{-1}) inverse block. 5. Apply it to the NLSM grade covector and recover J4⊗J4\mathsf J_4\otimes\mathsf J_4. 6. In the G\mathsf G-J\mathsf J pairing, show that the only additional contraction is the physical transverse-polarization coevaluation.

Frost: six-point disk comparison

  1. Compute R6=in⁡ZGD6scalarR_6=\operatorname{in}_Z G^{\rm scalar}_{D_6}.
  2. Verify the first comparison square on each allowed 3∣33|3 channel and zero residue on forbidden channels.
  3. Raise the compatible channel covector and check ρCJ6=J4⊗J4\rho_C\mathsf J_6=\mathsf J_4\otimes\mathsf J_4.
  4. Subtract the Cut-Equation completion from R6R_6; the remainder must define a cyclic, ordering-compatible primitive ω0,6\omega_{0,6}.

Plumbing dependence, failure of iterated-cut coassociativity, a singular induced channel pairing, or a non-covariant primitive falsifies intrinsic surface naturality.

Decision

Treat genus-zero CHY factorization of (Pf⁡′A)2(\operatorname{Pf}'A)^2 as established. Treat pairing monoidality as established only on the correctly oriented nearby-cycle channel quotient. Keep the scalar comparison χΣ\chi_\Sigma and the cut-kernel primitive ωΣ\omega_\Sigma as separate open Frost problems.

View source on GitHub