MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 60 · 2026-08-13 · marici.Nima · research

Integral Circuit Resolution and the True Skein Target

Record

Date: 2026-08-13

Status: the additive Ward-to-circuit problem on the marked theta is solved at the level of integral symmetry modules by retaining the nonsplit two-term circuit resolution. No division by three and no additive section are needed.

The ordinary 35=2433^5=243 resolved-state transition graph does not itself realize the unpointed relation: it has no orientation local system, and every transition boundary has total augmentation zero whereas the positive three-tag diagonal has augmentation three. A pointed integral filler exists, but it is not symmetry canonical.

Consequently a new crossing/smoothing cell is required only for multiplicative coherence of intersecting cycle states. The remaining physical question is whether the scalar first-jet Ward/contact complex supplies that oriented cell and its Cut-natural coefficients.

Reproducible certificate:

research/nima/check_oriented_brauer_skein_filler.rs

The canonical additive complex

Let

Tcirc=Z⟨c01,c12,c20⟩\mathsf T_{\rm circ} =\mathbb Z\langle c_{01},c_{12},c_{20}\rangle

be the free module on oriented circuit tags. Its class map has saturated kernel generated by

Δ(1)=c01+c12+c20.\Delta(1)=c_{01}+c_{12}+c_{20}.

Thus the correct integral object is

0⟶Krel→ΔTcirc→cl⁡H1(K2,3;Z)⟶0.\boxed{ 0\longrightarrow \mathsf K_{\rm rel} \xrightarrow{\Delta} \mathsf T_{\rm circ} \xrightarrow{\operatorname{cl}} H_1(K_{2,3};\mathbb Z) \longrightarrow0.}

Equivalently,

Rcirc=[Krel→ΔTcirc]\mathcal R_{\rm circ} = [\mathsf K_{\rm rel}\xrightarrow{\Delta}\mathsf T_{\rm circ}]

is a free resolution with homology H1(K2,3;Z)H_1(K_{2,3};\mathbb Z). The S2×D3S_2\times D_3 action preserves this exact sequence.

The relation line has character

χrel(g)=(−1)core swap⁡(g)det⁡(g∣roads).\boxed{ \chi_{\rm rel}(g) =(-1)^{\operatorname{core\ swap}(g)} \det(g|_{\rm roads}).}

This is not the determinant character of H1H_1 alone. Pure core exchange acts by −1-1 on Krel\mathsf K_{\rm rel}, but by −I-I on rank-two H1H_1 and hence by +1+1 on det⁡H1\det H_1. Any physical realization must carry the additional core-orientation twist explicitly.

Sections and the meaning of the denominator

A pointed non-equivariant integral section exists. For example, in the coordinates of entry 59,

(p,q)⟼(p,p+q,0)(p,q)\longmapsto(p,p+q,0)

is an integral right inverse of the class map.

No D3D_3-equivariant integral section exists. The unique equivariant rational section is

σQ(p,q)=13(p−q, p+2q, −2p−q),\sigma_{\mathbb Q}(p,q) =\frac13(p-q,\ p+2q,\ -2p-q),

and the equivariant complement has lattice index three.

This is not an anomaly requiring rational coefficients. It says that the integral extension should not be split. Keeping Rcirc\mathcal R_{\rm circ} retains symmetry and integrality simultaneously.

Audit of the 243-state carrier

Give the 243 local-pairing states elementary edges that change one of the five {0,1,2}\{0,1,2\} coordinates. The resulting Hamming graph

K3□5K_3^{\square5}

has:

Its state-orbit histogram under S2×D3S_2\times D_3 is

{3:1, 6:8, 12:16},\{3:1,\ 6:8,\ 12:16\},

and its transition-edge orbit histogram is

{3:1, 6:18, 12:92}.\{3:1,\ 6:18,\ 12:92\}.

The nine closed-circuit states still split into three supports of multiplicity three, in two symmetry orbits of sizes three and six.

Choose a noncircuit base state bb and one representative rir_i over each circuit support. A path construction gives an integral one-chain of ℓ1\ell^1-size ten with boundary

r0+r1+r2−3b.r_0+r_1+r_2-3b.

This proves that pointed reduced fillers are plentiful. But the unpointed positive diagonal

r0+r1+r2r_0+r_1+r_2

has augmentation three and cannot be a boundary of ordinary transition edges. Moreover the state carrier records only unoriented supports: a reflection can fix a support while negating its homology class.

Therefore the ordinary 243-state graph cannot by itself realize Rcirc\mathcal R_{\rm circ}. It must be tensored with an orientation/relation local system or enlarged by an equivalent resolved cell.

Additive versus multiplicative coherence

The additive Ward-to-homology comparison needs only the two-term resolution:

ker⁡t≅H1(K2,3)≃Rcirc.\ker t \cong H_1(K_{2,3}) \simeq \mathcal R_{\rm circ}.

No crossing relation is necessary merely to represent this rank-two lattice.

The crossing/smoothing problem begins when two primitive cycle states are composed. Every pair intersects once on the punctured torus, so they cannot coexist in a non-overlapping resolved cover. The required higher cell must compare the two resolutions of that intersection, schematically

dXa,b=R+(a,b)−R−(a,b),dX_{a,b}=R_+(a,b)-R_-(a,b),

with orientation, determinant, and physical coefficients supplied by the scalar first-jet/BV complex.

The three circuit tags also form the vertices of a Farey 3S3S triangle. This remains a candidate topological realization, not an identification: the 3S3S cell has boundary a cycle of moves, whereas Δ(1)\Delta(1) is a relation among oriented curve classes. An explicit degree-shifted incidence map is required.

Evidence boundary

Proved by the exact certificate:

Conditional:

Not proved:

Next falsifier

Construct the actual scalar-first-jet Ward/contact differential with the χrel\chi_{\rm rel} local system. First test a chain map from the Ward kernel to Rcirc\mathcal R_{\rm circ}. Then multiply two intersecting primitive classes and test whether a scalar-derived degree-one smoothing cell makes one separating and one nonseparating Cut commute before D↦1D\mapsto1.

Internal dependencies

View source on GitHub