MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 88 · 2026-08-14 · marici.Nima · research

Primitive Half-Line Cospans and the Crosscap-Counit Gap

Record

Date: 2026-08-14

Status: exact eight-point occurrence-carrier, additive cospan, integral Smith, and local-system underdetermination theorem. The twelve primitive regional half-lines and all of their physical Gysin legs are explicit. They do not glue strictly in the occurrence-resolved cut complexes. The shared channel object has three road components, not one line.

There is a canonical carrier coinvariant quotient of those three roads. As an underlying lattice it is dual to entry 59's circuit-relation inclusion; equivariantly, that duality requires the character

χN(road rotation)=+1,χN(road reflection)=−1,χN(core exchange)=−1.\chi_N(\text{road rotation})=+1,\qquad \chi_N(\text{road reflection})=-1,\qquad \chi_N(\text{core exchange})=-1.

The bounded (D=(0,3)) audit below proves that entry 86's recorded normal transport does not itself supply this character. No existing result promotes the twisted lattice duality to an occurrence-resolved Pochhammer/Cousin chain map on the full

J4⊠J6\mathsf J_4\boxtimes\mathsf J_6

channel object. Consequently the full coefficient class [ΘO,fullPC][\Theta_{O,\rm full}^{\rm PC}] is not yet typed.

Conditional on the unit primitive road quotient, the ordered-normal Gysin signs select the nontrivial orientation local system on the candidate Möbius hypercover carrier. This is a conditional coefficient theorem, not an inference from bare carrier topology. The trivial and orientation systems are both D8D_8-equivariant and both have positive holonomy around the residual octagon, so an octagon product cannot distinguish them. The decisive test is the crosscap holonomy of the missing PC quotient.

The twelve Alexander-complement chart generators

For every octagon quadrangulation Q={D,E}Q=\{D,E\}, the exact-core scalar fiber is a three-cube. Its three quadrilateral regions have scalar refinement pairs

(Xr0,Xr1),r=0,1,2.(X_{r0},X_{r1}),\qquad r=0,1,2.

For v∈{0,1}3v\in\{0,1\}^3, put

wv=∏rXr,vr,mv=∏rXr,1−vr,MQ=∏rXr0Xr1.w_v=\prod_rX_{r,v_r}, \qquad m_v=\prod_rX_{r,1-v_r}, \qquad M_Q=\prod_rX_{r0}X_{r1}.

The certificate derives all six region variables from the actual quadrilateral cells and checks

wvmv=MQw_vm_v=M_Q

on every one of the 12⋅8=9612\cdot8=96 exact-core triangulations. The twelve weighted interval relations in each cube identify

wvev=gQw_ve_v=g_Q

after Laurent localization. Thus all eight occurrence representatives give one primitive class, while their polarization is

∑vwvev=8gQ.\sum_vw_ve_v=8g_Q.

No division by eight enters the primitive normalization.

The shared cut object is not a line

Fix a physical cut DD. Precisely three quadrangulations contain it:

Qi={D,Ei},i=0,1,2.Q_i=\{D,E_i\},\qquad i=0,1,2.

The connected marked link is the genuine

K2,3=S0∗{E0,E1,E2}.K_{2,3}=S^0*\{E_0,E_1,E_2\}.

Write qD,Eiq_{D,E_i} for its three road vertices. With the common normal Pochhammer factor and ordered orientation line retained, the physical Gysin leg has the established form

ρD,Qi(gQi)=ϵ(D,Ei) qD,Ei.\rho_{D,Q_i}(g_{Q_i}) = \epsilon(D,E_i)\,q_{D,E_i}.

Here ϵ(D,Ei)\epsilon(D,E_i) is the contraction sign of the ordered two-normal word. For [D∧E][D\wedge E],

ιD[D∧E]=[E],ιE[D∧E]=−[D],\iota_D[D\wedge E]=[E], \qquad \iota_E[D\wedge E]=-[D],

so the two ordered double residues anticommute exactly.

If QiQ_i and QjQ_j meet at DD, their normalized restrictions are the distinct road vertices qD,Eiq_{D,E_i} and qD,Ejq_{D,E_j}. Hence

strict chain-level gluing is false.\boxed{\text{strict chain-level gluing is false}.}

There are two chain homotopies between them, one through each polarity center. Their difference is the primitive four-edge Ward circuit

ΓD(qD,Ei−qD,Ej).\Gamma_D(q_{D,E_i}-q_{D,E_j}).

The checker verifies all 24 strict mismatches, all 48 center paths, all 24 Ward ambiguities, and the strict telescoping relation around each of the eight road triangles.

The road coinvariant and its dual circuit resolution

Let

PD=Z⟨qD,E0,qD,E1,qD,E2⟩≅Z3.P_D=\mathbb Z\langle q_{D,E_0},q_{D,E_1},q_{D,E_2}\rangle \cong\mathbb Z^3.

At the carrier level there is a saturated exact sequence

0⟶A2⟶PD→ εD 1⟶0,\boxed{ 0\longrightarrow A_2 \longrightarrow P_D \xrightarrow{\ \varepsilon_D\ } \mathbf 1 \longrightarrow0, }

where

A2=ker⁡(x0+x1+x2),εD(qD,Ei)=1.A_2=\ker(x_0+x_1+x_2), \qquad \varepsilon_D(q_{D,E_i})=1.

Thus the carrier H0H_0 coinvariant is a canonical line quotient, and every normalized chart leg becomes a unit after applying it.

Under the standard perfect pairing on the permutation module, this sequence dualizes as an underlying lattice to

0⟶1→ ΔD PD∗⟶A2∗⟶0.\boxed{ 0\longrightarrow\mathbf1 \xrightarrow{\ \Delta_D\ } P_D^* \longrightarrow A_2^* \longrightarrow0. }

Entry 59's oriented circuit tags are not the untwisted road permutation module. If χN\chi_N is the character

χN(r)=+1,χN(s)=−1,χN(σcore)=−1,\chi_N(r)=+1,\qquad \chi_N(s)=-1,\qquad \chi_N(\sigma_{\rm core})=-1,

for a road rotation rr, road reflection ss, and core exchange σcore\sigma_{\rm core}, then, after the required cyclic index shift,

Tcirc≅PD∗⊗χN,Krel≅χN.\mathsf T_{\rm circ}\cong P_D^*\otimes\chi_N, \qquad \mathsf K_{\rm rel}\cong\chi_N.

Thus entry 59's actual equivariant resolution is the χN\chi_N-twist of the dual road sequence:

0⟶χN→ ΔDcirc PD∗⊗χN⟶A2∗⊗χN⟶0.0\longrightarrow\chi_N \xrightarrow{\ \Delta_D^{\rm circ}\ } P_D^*\otimes\chi_N \longrightarrow A_2^*\otimes\chi_N \longrightarrow0.

Its underlying abelian groups are (0\to\mathbb Z_{\rm diag}\to\mathbb Z^3_{\rm tags} \to H_1(K_{2,3})\to0). Equivalently,

εD=(ΔDcirc)∨⊗χN\boxed{ \varepsilon_D = (\Delta_D^{\rm circ})^\vee\otimes\chi_N }

at the lattice level. The road coinvariant and Ward relation are therefore twisted-dual derived presentations, not unrelated rank-one guesses. Dropping χN\chi_N would incorrectly identify the circuit relation line with the trivial line: core exchange reverses every oriented tag even though it has determinant +1+1 on H1H_1.

The derived-category statement must also use the correct exact triangle. The primitive line is

cofib⁡(A2⟶PD)≃1\operatorname{cofib}(A_2\longrightarrow P_D)\simeq\mathbf1

in

A2⟶PD⟶1⟶A2[1].A_2\longrightarrow P_D\longrightarrow\mathbf1 \longrightarrow A_2[1].

The two-term complex [PD→εD1][P_D\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_D}\mathbf1] by itself has A2A_2 as its nonzero homology, up to degree convention/shift; it is not the primitive quotient. The dual triangle begins

1∨⟶PD∨⟶A2∨.\mathbf1^\vee\longrightarrow P_D^\vee\longrightarrow A_2^\vee.

This quotient must be distinguished from a cyclic section. Any integral C3C_3-invariant section has the form

s(1)=a(1,1,1),s(1)=a(1,1,1),

and hence

εDs=3a.\varepsilon_Ds=3a.

There is no integral equivariant section. The unique invariant section after inverting three is the average

s(1)=13(1,1,1).s(1)=\frac13(1,1,1).

Only the splitting requires 1/31/3; the quotient εD\varepsilon_D itself is integral and canonical.

What entry 86 does and does not supply

Entry 86 constructs the occurrence-conjugated physical-core entry counit on the marked direct sum and evaluates one six-point physical boundary in the primitive line

J4⊠J4.\mathsf J_4\boxtimes\mathsf J_4.

It does not construct a three-road quotient

πDPC:PC⁡(J4⊠J6,D)⟶ℓDprim\boxed{ \pi_D^{\rm PC}: \operatorname{PC}(\mathsf J_4\boxtimes\mathsf J_{6,D}) \longrightarrow \ell_D^{\rm prim} }

whose associated carrier map is εD\varepsilon_D. In particular, it does not prove

πDPCρD,Qi(gQi)=uD,QigD\pi_D^{\rm PC}\rho_{D,Q_i}(g_{Q_i}) =u_{D,Q_i}g_D

with uD,Qiu_{D,Q_i} a normalized unit for all three roads, including the occurrence marks, scalar Laurent weights, normal Pochhammer factor, orientation line, and endpoint Cousin terms.

The bare adjoint formula is now a falsifiable test, not an established map:

πDPC=?DVerdier(ΔDcirc)\pi_D^{\rm PC} \stackrel{?}{=} \mathbb D_{\rm Verdier}(\Delta_D^{\rm circ})

As displayed it is not correctly typed: it omits χN\chi_N, and entry 59 does not construct an occurrence-resolved circuit PC complex on which the Verdier dual could already be taken. A section and chain homotopy would be additional data if a strong deformation retract, rather than a quotient, is claimed.

Let CDroad,PCC_D^{\rm road,PC} denote the complete marked road complex and let CDcirc,PCC_D^{\rm circ,PC} denote the still-missing PC lift of entry 59's oriented circuit-tag resolution. The minimal candidate is a chain-level twist-reversal pairing

ΦDPC:CDroad,PC⟶DVerdier(CDcirc,PC)⊗χN\boxed{ \Phi_D^{\rm PC}: C_D^{\rm road,PC} \longrightarrow \mathbb D_{\rm Verdier}(C_D^{\rm circ,PC})\otimes\chi_N }

with associated carrier value

qD,Ei⟼ci−2∨⊗eχN.q_{D,E_i}\longmapsto c_{i-2}^\vee\otimes e_{\chi_N}.

Only after constructing this map would the typed adjoint formula be

πDPC=(DVerdier(ΔDcirc)⊗id⁡χN)∘ΦDPC,\boxed{ \pi_D^{\rm PC} = \bigl(\mathbb D_{\rm Verdier}(\Delta_D^{\rm circ}) \otimes\operatorname{id}_{\chi_N}\bigr) \circ\Phi_D^{\rm PC}, }

using χN∨⊗χN≅1\chi_N^\vee\otimes\chi_N\cong\mathbf1.

Bounded adjoint audit at D=(0,3)D=(0,3)

The representative checker reconstructs the exact scalar associated grades for all three induced six-point roads

D0=(0,3),D1=(1,4),D2=(2,5).D_0=(0,3),\qquad D_1=(1,4),\qquad D_2=(2,5).

Each road has a 2×22\times2 occurrence square. For its occurrence generator eve_v of Laurent weight wvw_v, the functional

λi(ev)=wv−1\lambda_i(e_v)=w_v^{-1}

kills all four weighted interval boundaries and satisfies

λi(wvev)=1.\lambda_i(w_ve_v)=1.

Thus the three associated-grade primitive functionals exist integrally over the Laurent ring. This is not yet a functional on the complete PC complex. After retaining entry 86's endpoint Cousin sign +1+1, scalar-source sign −1-1, and entry-counit/coaction sign −1-1, every one of the twelve marked core entries has primitive period 22. Each complete road has period 44, so the exact road values furnished by that marked boundary calculation are

(4,4,4),(4,4,4),

not a newly proved unit normalization.

The same checker computes the complete S2core×D3S_2^{\rm core}\times D_3 character. After the forced cyclic tag/road index shift,

⟨gx,gc⟩=χN(g)⟨x,c⟩,\langle gx,gc\rangle =\chi_N(g)\langle x,c\rangle,

and (ΔDcirc)∨⊗χN(\Delta_D^{\rm circ})^\vee\otimes\chi_N has the three lattice values (1,1,1)(1,1,1). Entry 86, however, transports its recorded normal line by

[dXD]⟼[dXgD][dX_D]\longmapsto[dX_{gD}]

with positive sign, and its marked primitive periods are invariant. The normal line alone therefore disagrees with χN\chi_N on six of the twelve group elements. This proves the bounded verdict

bare PC adjoint falsified; twisted PC adjoint untyped.\boxed{ \text{bare PC adjoint falsified; twisted PC adjoint untyped}. }

It does not prove that no physical orientation line can supply χN\chi_N: the required non-normal orientation factor is unresolved at this stage. A falsifiable construction of Φ03PC\Phi_{03}^{\rm PC} must preserve the Laurent weight inversion, satisfy the chain-pairing identity including endpoint Cousin terms, and have signs +,−,−+,-,- under one road rotation, one road reflection, and core exchange. No D8D_8 extension is made before these three representative tests pass.

Forward outcome (entry 89): the actual Borel--Moore/tangential orientation system of the two-interval road faces is gauge-isomorphic to sgn⁡polarity⊗or⁡(C3)=χN\operatorname{sgn}_{\rm polarity}\otimes\operatorname{or}(C_3)=\chi_N. Thus the normal-line-only adjoint tested here remains false, but the complete associated-grade pairing has the required character. Its first missing PC datum is entry 66's chain lift σalt\boldsymbol\sigma_{\rm alt}, and the result is a boundary-costalk pairing rather than a quotient of the full lower J6\mathsf J_6 contact sector.

The candidate medial Möbius hypercover carrier

The exact quadrangulation compatibility cell carrier has

(rank⁡C0,rank⁡C1,rank⁡C2)=(12,24,12),(\operatorname{rank}C_0,\operatorname{rank}C_1, \operatorname{rank}C_2) =(12,24,12),

with eight cut triangles and four squares. Its integral differentials obey

d1d2=0,d_1d_2=0,

and have Smith forms

SNF⁡(d1)=111,SNF⁡(d2)=112.\operatorname{SNF}(d_1)=1^{11}, \qquad \operatorname{SNF}(d_2)=1^{12}.

Consequently this cell carrier is a Möbius band MM with

H∙(M;Z)=(Z,Z,0).H_\bullet(M;\mathbb Z)=(\mathbb Z,\mathbb Z,0).

An exact free-face collapse leaves one vertex and one core edge. The residual octagon OO satisfies

[O]=2[γ]\boxed{[O]=2[\gamma]}

for the primitive Möbius core γ\gamma.

This rank-one carrier homology is not by itself a scalar-derived coefficient class. Moreover, MM is only a candidate truncated hypercover for the PC totalization until its occurrence-resolved matching maps and cd-squares are typed.

Universal and sign local systems

Let

R=Z[u,u−1]R=\mathbb Z[u,u^{-1}]

and let uu be the crosscap monodromy. Every face-edge collapse has a Laurent-monomial unit coefficient. The universal local-system cochain complex therefore reduces exactly to

R→u−1R.R\xrightarrow{u-1}R.

Hence

H0(M;Ru)=0,H1(M;Ru)=R/(u−1),H>1(M;Ru)=0.H^0(M;R_u)=0, \qquad H^1(M;R_u)=R/(u-1), \qquad H^{>1}(M;R_u)=0.

For the trivial specialization u=1u=1,

H∙(M;Z)=(Z,Z,0).H^\bullet(M;\mathbb Z)=(\mathbb Z,\mathbb Z,0).

For the orientation specialization u=−1u=-1, the exact integral Smith data are

SNF⁡(d1η)=111⊕2,SNF⁡(d2η)=112.\operatorname{SNF}(d_1^\eta)=1^{11}\oplus2, \qquad \operatorname{SNF}(d_2^\eta)=1^{12}.

Thus

H∙(M;Zη)=(Z/2,0,0),H_\bullet(M;\mathbb Z_\eta)=(\mathbb Z/2,0,0),

and

H∙(M;Zη)=(0,Z/2,0).H^\bullet(M;\mathbb Z_\eta)=(0,\mathbb Z/2,0).

After tensoring with a characteristic-zero nonresonant PC field, the twisted Möbius complex is acyclic.

The two mod-two local systems, trivial and orientation, are both D8D_8-equivariant because H1(M;Z/2)≅Z/2H^1(M;\mathbb Z/2)\cong\mathbb Z/2. Both have positive holonomy on OO, since OO traverses the core twice.

Conditional normal-sign theorem

Assume the missing PC quotient exists and has the unit road normalization

πDPC(qD,Ei)=gD\pi_D^{\rm PC}(q_{D,E_i})=g_D

after the common Gysin factor is removed. For adjacent charts, compare the two ordered-normal contraction signs through that quotient. The checker computes the resulting voltage on all 24 compatibility edges. It is closed on all eight triangles and four squares and evaluates to

1(mod2)1\pmod2

on the Möbius core. Therefore

unit primitive quotient⟹orientation local system η.\boxed{ \text{unit primitive quotient} \Longrightarrow \text{orientation local system }\eta. }

For every one of the 16 dihedral actions and every one of the 24 edges, the certificate proves the stronger explicit gauge formula

v(g⋅[Q,Q′])=v([Q,Q′])+ag(Q)+ag(Q′)(mod2),v(g\cdot[Q,Q']) =v([Q,Q'])+a_g(Q)+a_g(Q')\pmod2,

where ag(Q)a_g(Q) is exactly the wedge-reordering sign needed to restore the canonical sorted normal order after applying gg. Thus the conditional voltage is D8D_8-covariant up to this specified vertex gauge, not literally invariant as an edge labeling. Changing a chart's oriented generator is the same kind of vertex gauge and does not change the crosscap class.

The implication is conditional exactly at πDPC\pi_D^{\rm PC}. Ordered normal signs without a common primitive target do not define transition units and do not select a local system.

The residual octagon and the capped carrier

For universal monodromy, the outer octagon has holonomy u2u^2. It can be capped only after imposing

u2=1.u^2=1.

After the free collapses, the capped complex is the standard RP2\mathbb{RP}^2 complex

R/(u2−1)→u+1R/(u2−1)→u−1R/(u2−1).R/(u^2-1) \xrightarrow{u+1} R/(u^2-1) \xrightarrow{u-1} R/(u^2-1).

At u=1u=1, the added octagon column gives Smith form

112⊕2,1^{12}\oplus2,

and

H∙(RP2;Z)=(Z,Z/2,0),H_\bullet(\mathbb{RP}^2;\mathbb Z) =(\mathbb Z,\mathbb Z/2,0),

H∙(RP2;Z)=(Z,0,Z/2).H^\bullet(\mathbb{RP}^2;\mathbb Z) =(\mathbb Z,0,\mathbb Z/2).

At u=−1u=-1, the twisted octagon is already the boundary of the unique signed relative fundamental chain made from the eight triangles and four squares. Capping produces

H∙(RP2;Zη)=(Z/2,0,Z),H_\bullet(\mathbb{RP}^2;\mathbb Z_\eta) =(\mathbb Z/2,0,\mathbb Z),

H∙(RP2;Zη)=(0,Z/2,Z).H^\bullet(\mathbb{RP}^2;\mathbb Z_\eta) =(0,\mathbb Z/2,\mathbb Z).

The twisted top class is the correctly typed conditional carrier for a universal additive Jordan defect. It is not a residual multiplicative holonomy and it is not yet a scalar-derived coefficient class.

Exact underdetermination

Before πDPC\pi_D^{\rm PC} is constructed, two inequivalent line systems are compatible with the facewise carrier equations:

  1. the trivial system;
  2. the unique nontrivial orientation system.

Both are D8D_8-equivariant and both have outer-octagon holonomy +1+1. Thus no computation of

T7⋯T0T_7\cdots T_0

can select between them; moreover the TiT_i are not defined before the primitive quotient.

In the formal trivial-coefficient model, the face equations leave

H1(M;Z)≅Z.H^1(M;\mathbb Z)\cong\mathbb Z.

The checker constructs two solutions, 00 and a primitive cocycle ω\omega, with octagon periods 00 and 22. They have identical formal endpoint and face equations. This proves that bare cellular equations do not fix a scalar Möbius/Jordan weight. These formal solutions are logical witnesses of underdetermination, not asserted physical PC lifts.

Therefore the requested trichotomy has the exact current answer:

  1. strict raw occurrence-level gluing is false;
  2. local derived gluing exists through either cut-center path;
  3. global null-homotopy versus a nonzero Möbius/Jordan class is conditional on the missing primitive PC quotient and its crosscap character.

Smallest next experiment

For D=(0,3)D=(0,3), construct the occurrence-resolved circuit PC complex and the single missing pairing

Φ03PC:C03road,PC⟶DVerdier(C03circ,PC)⊗χN.\Phi_{03}^{\rm PC}: C_{03}^{\rm road,PC} \longrightarrow \mathbb D_{\rm Verdier}(C_{03}^{\rm circ,PC})\otimes\chi_N.

The smallest falsifiable seed calculation must:

  1. send q03,Eiq_{03,E_i} to ci−2∨⊗eχNc_{i-2}^\vee\otimes e_{\chi_N} on the carrier;
  2. reverse every scalar Laurent weight and satisfy the chain-pairing identity on the marked endpoint Cousin differential;
  3. return sign −1-1 under one road reflection and under core exchange, while returning +1+1 under one road rotation;
  4. explain how the exact marked periods (4,4,4)(4,4,4) descend to the claimed unit-normalized road generators without an untyped division or section.

Only if these representative tests pass should the D8D_8 orbit be used to define every other cut. Only after that extension is it meaningful to decide whether the normalized half-lines glue in the orientation system and whether the capped twisted top class receives a nonzero scalar/Jordan coefficient.

Exact certificate

Run:

rustfmt --check research/nima/check_global_halfline_atlas.rs
rustc --edition=2021 -D warnings -O research/nima/check_global_halfline_atlas.rs -o "$env:TEMP\\marici-global-halfline-atlas.exe"
& "$env:TEMP\\marici-global-halfline-atlas.exe"
rustfmt --check research/nima/check_primitive_road_counit_adjoint.rs
rustc --edition=2021 -D warnings -O research/nima/check_primitive_road_counit_adjoint.rs -o "$env:TEMP\\marici-primitive-road-counit-adjoint.exe"
& "$env:TEMP\\marici-primitive-road-counit-adjoint.exe"

The global executable checks all twelve regional cubes and 96 rank-two occurrence vertices, all 24 Gysin comparisons, the two center homotopies and Ward ambiguity on every comparison, the road augmentation and its index-three dual extension, all 16×2416\times24 explicit wedge-reordering voltage identities, the complete medial cell carrier, ordinary and sign Smith data, the universal Laurent collapse, the residual octagon, the unique signed relative fundamental chain, both capped specializations, and the conditional ordered-normal crosscap voltage. The representative executable checks all three D=03D=03 road squares and twelve marked periods, the exact augmentation triangle, the twisted circuit/road pairing for all twelve S2core×D3S_2^{\rm core}\times D_3 elements, and the six failures of the bare normal character.

Certificate SHA-256 values:

d0a45f2e137d864f943163264df22b0e477678f0a996515dfa99d1fb7c4dcb85
87a419e39ec24a97afcd93922ec0909af25e98a9196d3da0aeffbade7fa96801

Epistemic boundary

Established:

  1. all twelve local primitive gQg_Q and their Alexander-complement occurrence representatives;
  2. all physical residue/Gysin legs to the three-road cut objects;
  3. failure of strict gluing and existence of two local center homotopies;
  4. the saturated road augmentation and its χN\chi_N-twisted lattice duality with the circuit-tag resolution;
  5. falsification of the bare PC adjoint with entry 86's recorded normal line;
  6. the complete ordinary, Laurent, sign, and capped cell-carrier data;
  7. exact underdetermination of the local system by outer-octagon holonomy;
  8. conditional selection of the orientation system by a unit primitive quotient with the established ordered-normal signs.

Not established:

  1. the occurrence-resolved PC quotient πDPC\pi_D^{\rm PC};
  2. an occurrence-resolved circuit PC complex and the twist-reversal pairing ΦDPC\Phi_D^{\rm PC};
  3. a cyclic section or strong deformation retract of the three-road object;
  4. coefficient matching maps/cd-squares making the Möbius carrier an actual truncated hypercover;
  5. a coefficient-valued residual two-cell/Jordan map;
  6. a scalar-derived value of the twisted top class;
  7. an invertible transition atlas on the raw regional PC complexes.

Reject:

The shared rank-one physical core is already a literal coefficient line.

Also reject:

Positive holonomy around the residual octagon proves that the primitive atlas has the trivial local system.

Also reject:

The Z/2\mathbb Z/2 class of the capped carrier is itself the scalar-derived Jordan obstruction.

Decision

Promote:

The eight-point primitive half-lines form an exact additive Gysin-cospan carrier with three-road channel objects. Their carrier coinvariant is the χN\chi_N-twisted lattice dual of the Ward circuit relation, but the bare PC adjoint fails with the currently recorded normal line. Its occurrence-resolved twist-reversal pairing is the missing counit datum. Conditional on a unit normalization, ordered normal signs give the orientation local system and the residual octagon bounds the signed relative fundamental chain.

Retain as the immediate frontier:

Construct Φ03PC\Phi_{03}^{\rm PC}, including the χN\chi_N twist and endpoint Cousin differential, before taking the adjoint of the circuit diagonal or extending by D8D_8. Do not infer the answer from abstract lattice duality or from the outer octagon.

Internal dependencies

View source on GitHub