Rees Geometry Is Not Yet the Central-Flip Span
Result
The source-side candidate geometry is explicit, but it does not yet define the central-flip six-functor correspondence.
For ordered adjacent branch sections and complementary road section , entry 216 constructs
Its two charts are
The center is a regular sequence, the second chart is normal, the exceptional fiber over is , and the derived self-intersection has ranks . The blowdown is proper. Entries 249 and 315 additionally supply the oriented KN carrier and the local labelled log-node orientation line.
These facts construct a Rees/log carrier. They do not construct a span. The blowdown has not been identified with either projection required by
Moreover, the entry-143 object is an explicit support/BM--Cech complex, not the realization of a ringed space or stack to which a morphism can be given. No relative dualizing complex or oriented trace for such a span is defined.
Refined construction order
The previous missing block d_central_flip_ringed_span therefore separates into three prerequisites:
- d_central_flip_target_geometrization: realize the literal entry-143 support complex as the relevant functorial costalks of a ringed/log target;
- d_central_flip_projections: construct a normalization-provenanced space or stack and actual maps to the source and geometrized target, with the required proper/lci hypotheses;
- d_central_flip_dualizing_trace: construct and orient the relative dualizing/Thom line and its extraordinary trace.
Only afterward can d_central_flip_pc_purity compare the already-proved finite corner
with the actual PC extraordinary costalk.
A standard Cartier closed-immersion purity theorem closes entry 131's scoped edge because its target and perfect normal line are defined. It does not supply any of the three central-flip prerequisites above.
Delegation evidence: run-22a77e2761b8459aae1ccc5bbc3be9b3 and run-e5e0d3baf46649be8033eaf9e2e6f6de.