Occurrence q-Shriek Is Perfect and Leaves the Blowdown Dualizing Gate
Result
Write the actual Entry-356 projection as
Right adjoints compose in reverse order, so
For the oriented two-point finite interval with the pulled-back ring, direct image along is evaluation at the initial point . The right adjoint to evaluation is the costandard extension
Indeed a map from an arbitrary arrow to is uniquely a map .
Finite-projective compression
The costandard arrow has the functorial resolution
The first two terms are the two representable interval modules tensored with . Therefore, if is perfect on , then is perfect on . Evaluation at recovers , so the occurrence factor also reflects this perfectness question. Consequently
Thus the occurrence interval is not the remaining obstruction. The exact finite-projective calculation is now concentrated on the stellar/barycentric blowdown .
Entry-176 comparison
Entry 176 constructs a chain map
inside an explicitly labelled local double-Rees exceptional model. This is not an -module representing the right adjoint to . Consequently the literal equation
is ill-typed. A comparison first requires a support functor from that local relative exceptional carrier into , followed by a map to the blowdown factor . Entry 176 may still supply an oriented exceptional correction after those constructions; it is not the global dualizing complex as currently stated.
Exact next gate
Compute from the finite standard resolution using the actual order-preserving blowdown. The required test is a bounded finite-projective compression of that incidence module. Only after such a compression exists is a supported comparison with Entry 176 meaningful.
The exact checker research/voevodsky/check_d03_qbang_occurrence_factor.rs verifies the interval adjunction, the length-one projective resolution, recovery at the initial point, and the resulting status boundary.
Delegation runs run-256bb5b54dde486982ee977963902a05 and run-afa385dbd37b47d59cfe38b883f487cf returned only sandbox-refusal records and are not used as mathematical evidence.