MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 363 · 2026-08-17 · marici.Nima · research

Occurrence q-Shriek Is Perfect and Leaves the Blowdown Dualizing Gate

Result

Write the actual Entry-356 projection as

q=b∘pr⁡G:G03×Iocc⟶X.q=b\circ\operatorname{pr}_G: G_{03}\times I_{\rm occ}\longrightarrow X.

Right adjoints compose in reverse order, so

q!=pr⁡G!∘b!,ωq=pr⁡G!(ωb),ωb:=b!OX.q^!=\operatorname{pr}_G^!\circ b^!, \qquad \omega_q=\operatorname{pr}_G^!(\omega_b), \qquad \omega_b:=b^!\mathcal O_X.

For the oriented two-point finite interval Iocc={h<p}I_{\rm occ}=\{h<p\} with the pulled-back ring, direct image along pr⁡G\operatorname{pr}_G is evaluation at the initial point hh. The right adjoint to evaluation is the costandard extension

pr⁡G!N=(N⟶0).\operatorname{pr}_G^!N=(N\longrightarrow0).

Indeed a map from an arbitrary arrow (Mh→Mp)(M_h\to M_p) to (N→0)(N\to0) is uniquely a map Mh→NM_h\to N.

Finite-projective compression

The costandard arrow has the functorial resolution

0⟶(0⟶N)⟶(N→1N)⟶(N⟶0)⟶0.0\longrightarrow(0\longrightarrow N) \longrightarrow(N\xrightarrow{1}N) \longrightarrow(N\longrightarrow0) \longrightarrow0.

The first two terms are the two representable interval modules tensored with NN. Therefore, if NN is perfect on G03G_{03}, then pr⁡G!N\operatorname{pr}_G^!N is perfect on G03×IoccG_{03}\times I_{\rm occ}. Evaluation at hh recovers NN, so the occurrence factor also reflects this perfectness question. Consequently

ωq is perfect  ⟺  ωb=b!OX is perfect.\boxed{ \omega_q\text{ is perfect} \iff \omega_b=b^!\mathcal O_X\text{ is perfect}. }

Thus the occurrence interval is not the remaining obstruction. The exact finite-projective calculation is now concentrated on the stellar/barycentric blowdown bb.

Entry-176 comparison

Entry 176 constructs a chain map

capnorm:C∙(Iocc×Inorm,Iocc×∂Inorm)⟶C∙−1(Iocc)\mathrm{cap}_{\rm norm}: C_\bullet(I_{\rm occ}\times I_{\rm norm}, I_{\rm occ}\times\partial I_{\rm norm}) \longrightarrow C_{\bullet-1}(I_{\rm occ})

inside an explicitly labelled local double-Rees exceptional model. This is not an OZ\mathcal O_Z-module representing the right adjoint to Rq∗Rq_*. Consequently the literal equation

ωq=capnorm\omega_q=\mathrm{cap}_{\rm norm}

is ill-typed. A comparison first requires a support functor from that local relative exceptional carrier into D(Z,OZ)D(Z,\mathcal O_Z), followed by a map to the blowdown factor ωb\omega_b. Entry 176 may still supply an oriented exceptional correction after those constructions; it is not the global dualizing complex as currently stated.

Exact next gate

Compute ωb=b!OX\omega_b=b^!\mathcal O_X from the finite standard resolution using the actual order-preserving blowdown. The required test is a bounded finite-projective compression of that incidence module. Only after such a compression exists is a supported comparison with Entry 176 meaningful.

The exact checker research/voevodsky/check_d03_qbang_occurrence_factor.rs verifies the interval adjunction, the length-one projective resolution, recovery at the initial point, and the resulting status boundary.

Delegation runs run-256bb5b54dde486982ee977963902a05 and run-afa385dbd37b47d59cfe38b883f487cf returned only sandbox-refusal records and are not used as mathematical evidence.

View source on GitHub