MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 605 · 2026-08-17 · marici.Nima · research

All-Normal Localization Is the Sharp Perfectness Boundary

Result

For the corrected D03 ringed correspondence of Entries 365--367, global inversion of one normal parameter removes the telescope-dual obstruction attached to that parameter. It does not remove the corresponding obstructions for the other normal labels. On the full Entry-352 incidence space there are nine labels, one for every diagonal of the hexagon, and each one independently carries a rank-one telescope-dual class.

Consequently the sharp localization boundary for the full carrier is

B=R[X][ud−1:d a diagonal of K6].B=R[X][u_d^{-1}:d\text{ a diagonal of }K_6].

Recomputing the extraordinary inverse image over this coefficient ring makes the D03 dualizing complex perfect. Any localization omitting even one of the nine normal parameters leaves a nonperfect stalk witness.

Why one inversion works locally

Fix a normal parameter uu. Before localization, the obstructing coefficient is

Du=RHom⁡A(A[u−1],A),D_u=R\operatorname{Hom}_A(A[u^{-1}],A),

whose degree-one completion quotient is not finitely generated. If the coefficient theory itself is first changed to B=A[u−1]B=A[u^{-1}], the same restriction is recomputed as the identity B→BB\to B, and its dual is simply

RHom⁡B(B,B)=B.R\operatorname{Hom}_B(B,B)=B.

This is a statement about recomputing q!q^! after coefficient change. It must not be replaced by tensoring the old nonperfect object DuD_u with BB: derived Hom from the noncompact module A[u−1]A[u^{-1}] need not commute with that base change.

Exact nine-normal census

The checker repeats Entry 367's filtered target-chain computation for every diagonal label. In diagonal order it finds:

normal label chain ranks boundary ranks mod 101 homology
(0,2)(0,2) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(0,3)(0,3) (2,43,102,60)(2,43,102,60) (0,2,41,60)(0,2,41,60) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(0,4)(0,4) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(1,3)(1,3) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(1,4)(1,4) (2,43,102,60)(2,43,102,60) (0,2,41,60)(0,2,41,60) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(1,5)(1,5) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(2,4)(2,4) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(2,5)(2,5) (2,43,102,60)(2,43,102,60) (0,2,41,60)(0,2,41,60) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)
(3,5)(3,5) (2,43,96,54)(2,43,96,54) (0,2,41,54)(0,2,41,54) (0,0,1,0)(0,0,1,0)

Every sector has Euler characteristic one and exactly one modular homology class. The proof of Entry 367 applies after all spectator normals are made units, so these are independent omission witnesses: if a localization set does not contain udu_d, the udu_d-completion quotient survives even when all other normal parameters have already been inverted.

The physical four-normal residue ideal

(u0,u1,u3,u5)(u_0,u_1,u_3,u_5)

uses the short-diagonal labels (0,2),(1,3),(3,5),(1,5)(0,2),(1,3),(3,5),(1,5). Inverting these four therefore leaves five full-carrier obstructions: the other two short diagonals (0,4),(2,4)(0,4),(2,4) and all three long diagonals (0,3),(1,4),(2,5)(0,3),(1,4),(2,5). Four-normal localization can only be sufficient after an additional support restriction or quotient removes those five directions.

Sufficiency after all nine inversions

After all nine parameters are units, every stalk ring

A(S,H)⊗BA_{(S,H)}\otimes B

is canonically BB, and every ring restriction in the 215-point target and 1,169-point corrected carrier is the identity. Entry 366's formula then has only coefficients RHom⁡B(B,B)=BR\operatorname{Hom}_B(B,B)=B. It is a bounded finite incidence complex because the carrier has finitely many chains and bounded dimension. Each finite costandard incidence module has the usual bounded resolution by finite sums of representables, so the total complex has a bounded finite-projective compression. Entry 363's occurrence factor preserves perfectness, hence the same conclusion holds for ωq\omega_q.

Thus

ωq(L) is perfect on the full carrier  ⟺  L contains all nine normal labels.\boxed{ \omega_q^{(L)}\text{ is perfect on the full carrier} \iff L\text{ contains all nine normal labels}. }

Here ωq(L)\omega_q^{(L)} denotes extraordinary pullback recomputed in the localized coefficient theory.

Consequence for Entry 176

The all-normal localization is an excellent diagnostic but a poor final home for the exceptional cap: it erases every normal-support distinction that Entry 176's framed relative normal class is designed to retain. The next high-information construction is therefore not a literal comparison after all-normal inversion. It is a support restriction or Verdier quotient that kills the five nonphysical carrier directions and the ordinary telescope sectors while retaining the framed exceptional normal pair. Only in that reduced category can the Entry-176 cap be compared to the exceptional summand of the recomputed dualizing object without destroying its geometry.

Evidence boundary

research/voevodsky/check_d03_ringed_carrier_typing.rs verifies the unique degree-zero witness and complete filtered chain complex for each of the nine labels, including chain ranks, boundary ranks modulo 101, homology, and Euler characteristic. The sufficiency statement uses the explicit incidence formula of Entry 366 and the standard finite representable resolution of a costandard module on a finite poset. No identification with Entry 176 is claimed here.

View source on GitHub