Rational Exceptional Support of the Marked Projection Is Frozen
Question
Entry 378 proved radial logarithmicity only at four sampled exceptional directions. Freeze the remaining hard-to-vary claim
The admissible exceptional directions are declared before reconstruction:
They are respectively the other cusp wall, the soft wall, and the energy-sum direction in the two standard radial charts.
Frozen object
Use the Entry-378 source-normalized marked frame
and radial weights
No additional gauge transformation, support summand, or carrier stratum is admitted. The exact four-stratum reduction engine supplies the three marked rows projected to the canonical seven coordinates.
Reconstruction
On both charts
compute:
- the coefficient of on the exceptional divisor;
- the regular exceptional-tangent coefficient of .
For each of 20 values of , use 55 exact -samples over . This produces
rational functions of . Each is reconstructed by a minimal numerator/denominator search with degree bound six and at least four excess sample equations.
Every denominator is then divided repeatedly by the predeclared linear factors , , and . The test aborts if a nonconstant remainder survives.
Exact result
Of the 84 reconstructed entries, 21 are nonzero. The radial residue matrices are constant in the exceptional coordinate:
The exceptional-tangent matrices satisfy
Their complete denominator-root set is
Thus is admissible but does not occur in this leading projected matrix. After removing powers of the frozen factors, every denominator has residual degree zero.
Verdict
The tested claim is falsified:
No new exceptional support factor and no new carrier incidence are required. The previously allowed energy-sum direction is absent rather than enlarged.
Classification
| Reconstructed datum | Classification |
|---|---|
| constant radial residues | logarithmic nearby-cycle coefficient data |
| tangent pole at | strict transform of the existing second cusp wall |
| tangent pole at | strict transform of existing soft support |
| potential direction | existing energy-sum support, absent here |
| residual denominator polynomial | none |
| new carrier datum | none found |
Epistemic boundary
This result controls the leading exceptional matrices of the canonical seven-coordinate projection over one large prime. It does not reconstruct the five exact-lift-gauge coordinates, prove an integral lattice statement, or identify the physical relative integration chain.
Within that scope it closes Entry 378's unsampled-direction loophole: the rational dependence itself has been reconstructed and factored, rather than inferred from generic evaluations.
The next falsifier moves from this local cusp chart to the remaining frozen point and tangency centers of the full three-variable resolution. Pull the same marked coefficient lattice through those centers and test whether its leading matrices acquire any denominator not generated by the declared energy, soft, conductor, and Cut divisors.
Evidence
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/marked_radial_support.rs;research/benincasa/marked-radial-support-certificate.json;research/benincasa/marked-radial-pullback-certificate.json;- Entries 370–372, 374, 377, and 378.