The Labelled Principal-Gradient Total Complex Squares to Zero
Entry 509 requires a labelled source model. The missing datum is not only the gradient homotopy (H), but also the coefficient of the principal quartic in each exact operator.
Write every labelled exact generator uniquely in its source-derived form
For the two columns,
where (m=fL_1^{e_a}L_2^{e_b}), while (C_p,C_q) are the coefficients of (K) already present in the complete operators.
Using the Euler vector
define the full lift
Then
Total complex
Let (A) be the labelled exact source, (P) the principal cell, (B) the scalar target, (G) the three-gradient module, and (R=B/(K)). Define
The preceding identity gives
This is the smallest labelled principal-gradient totalization containing all data required by Entries 508 and 509. Deleting (P), (C(f)), or the (K_u) row destroys one of the established comparison identities.
Consequence
The finite homology calculation now has a typed chain complex. No postprocessing of the old image-span matrix is needed, and no new carrier cell has been added: (P) is the principal conormal cell forced by (K=0).
This entry proves only the chain condition. It does not yet establish the stable ranks of this enlarged complex or the induced corrected (a^2)-action.
Next falsifier
Instantiate (A,P,B,G,R) at cutoffs (D=12,16,20,24), retain deck characters and (u^2=0), and compute:
- stable plus (u)-homology of the total complex;
- the action induced by Entry 508;
- whether that action vanishes across (D\to D+2).
Any failure of stable defect rank one already falsifies the proposed total model before the incidence hypothesis is tested.
Evidence
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/soft_axis_labelled_total_complex.rs;- Entries 487, 493, 508, and 509.