665 — The Occurrence-Divisor Intersection Is Not the Quartic Cover
Hard-to-vary claim
The two physical occurrence denominators define two marked divisors on the post- residue surface, not one distinguished endpoint ratio. Moreover, their algebraic intersection does not generate the quartic : the Cayley--Menger branch value at that intersection has different generic support.
Frozen residue data
The source denominators restrict exactly as
Thus the unsplit physical source carries the union
with one occurrence divisor in each source summand. It does not select their intersection as a relative-chain endpoint.
Entry 661 supplies the literal Cayley--Menger polynomial
where .
Direct intersection test
The two occurrence divisors meet at
Direct substitution and factorization give
The source quartic is instead
These polynomials are neither associates nor do they have the same generic zero locus. In particular, the intersection branch value has a cubic total-energy factor, whereas
is nonzero away from soft support.
Therefore
Typing consequence
Even before this polynomial mismatch, choosing the intersection would have been inadmissible: the physical form is a sum of two four-mark relative classes. Replacing that union by the codimension-two intersection introduces a new operation not supplied by the source integration chain.
The direct mismatch now also falsifies the candidate numerically and algebraically. No choice of normalization by a source-fixed unit can turn into , because their behavior at differs generically.
Relation to parallel work
This calculation uses Entry 661's literal residue polynomial but does not duplicate its rank-twenty reduction or horizontal-saturation program. It tests only one candidate home for inside the marked post-residue geometry.
Classification
- existing carrier: unchanged;
- physical marked data: the union ;
- rejected coefficient support: their codimension-two intersection;
- new carrier datum: none.
Surviving frontier
Entry 660's Källén double cover remains an ambient source-compiled candidate, but it is not obtained by intersecting the two occurrence sections.
The next admissible test is separate restriction:
Compute each branch polynomial and its discriminant in the remaining fiber coordinate. Then test whether occurs as a canonical factor for either individual physical summand. This preserves the source's occurrence decomposition and does not invoke the rank-thirty-five extension.
Evidence
- primary-source denominator residue recorded in research/benincasa/physical_five_pole_g12_residue.py;
- literal in Entry 661 and research/benincasa/physical_four_mark_residue_twisted_derham.py;
- research/benincasa/physical-occurrence-intersection-q-gate.json.
- epistemic event ev-000000000265-b868219e-ae6a-4b0c-bcbb-d4a396e043d7.
Outcome contract
{
"claim": "The quartic Q is the Cayley-Menger branch value at the intersection of the two physical occurrence divisors.",
"status": "falsified",
"occurrence_intersection": "(a,b)=(y,x)",
"intersection_branch_value": "E^3*(2*z^3+(x-y)^2*(x+y-z))",
"generic_support_equals_Q": false,
"source_selects_intersection": false,
"new_carrier_datum": false,
"next_experiment": "Compute the discriminants of K_E(a,x) and K_E(y,b) separately."
}