690 — The Leray Boundary Class Is Flat to First Order
Question
Entry 688 shows that the first variation of the oriented physical residue coefficient has only established energy poles. The remaining possible first-order contribution to the local connecting class is motion of the two marked attachment sections defining the Leray boundary.
Weighted expansion
Use the total-energy weighted chart
After dividing the Cayley–Menger equation by , its exceptional leading term is
The physical attachment sections lie on (n=0) and specialize to (r=-1) and (r=1).
Exact first motion
Solve the full source polynomial with
Coefficient comparison gives
and
The sections move inside the same exceptional chart but remain labelled, disjoint, and unramified over the generic nonsoft base.
Relative homology consequence
In the moving relative basis
the physical interval retains boundary
Thus its Gauss–Manin derivative vanishes to first order:
The coordinate motion changes representatives, not the relative homology class. It introduces no new pole and no quartic factor.
Combined first-order conclusion
At the local oriented-pairing level, the complete first variation is therefore the scalar variation already computed in Entry 688:
No -support occurs in either the residue variation or the Leray-boundary variation. This still does not determine global gluing into the rank-seven algebraic kernel; Entry 689's character-matching problem remains the next obstruction.
Evidence
research/benincasa/check_leray_attachment_first_order.py;research/benincasa/leray-attachment-first-order.json;research/benincasa/et-cut-nearby-normal-form.json;- Entries 688–689;
- allocator claim
seqclaim-141510bc25972a3455132ad1.
Next falsifier
Decompose the algebraic Gysin kernel under the surface-normalization involution and test whether it contains a unique anti-invariant line capable of receiving the oriented conductor costalk.