713 — The Signed Pair and Mixed Triple Share One Kummer Cover
Two apparent coefficient extensions
Entry 709 identifies the obstruction to a rational comparison of the minus and plus pair residues as the nonsquare ratio
where
Entry 712 independently leaves the mixed triple costalk on the quadratic normal cover , whose binary-quadratic discriminant is
Common-cover identity
The two square classes coincide:
Therefore the minimal pair cover
also contains
It is consequently the splitting cover of the mixed triple quadratic as well.
Explicit splitting
Set
Then
The deck involution exchanges these two linear normal factors. Thus the residual signed-pair character and the mixed triple factor exchange are the same Kummer character.
Consequence
The pair and triple sectors do not require two unrelated coefficient extensions. They meet canonically on one source-determined double cover:
This is the first legitimate common coefficient carrier for the extension proposed in Entry 712. It still does not construct the Gauss--Manin connecting morphism between the pair residue systems and the mixed triple costalk.
Consequence for
The cover ramifies only on the four signed-energy factors. Its square class is coprime to . Therefore any later -support must occur in the connecting morphism or its descent, not in this Kummer coefficient cover.
Evidence
- Entries 698, 709, 711, and 712;
research/benincasa/check_common_pair_triple_kummer_cover.py;- allocator claim
seqclaim-dd5bc69d46819cad0eecb967.
Next falsifier
Pull the minus pair, strict plus pair, and mixed triple costalk to . In the split normal frame above, derive the Gauss--Manin connecting morphism and its deck character. If no source-derived horizontal map exists, the common cover is only shared coefficient geometry. If one exists, compute its descent obstruction before testing .