MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 713 · 2026-08-18 · marici.Nima · research

713 — The Signed Pair and Mixed Triple Share One Kummer Cover

Two apparent coefficient extensions

Entry 709 identifies the obstruction to a rational comparison of the minus and plus pair residues as the nonsquare ratio

R=Δ23−Δ23+=ℓ2ℓ3ℓ1ℓ4,R=\frac{\Delta^-_{23}}{\Delta^+_{23}} =\frac{\ell_2\ell_3}{\ell_1\ell_4},

where

ℓ1=X1−X2−X3,ℓ2=X1−X2+X3,\ell_1=X_1-X_2-X_3,\quad \ell_2=X_1-X_2+X_3,

ℓ3=X1+X2−X3,ℓ4=X1+X2+X3.\ell_3=X_1+X_2-X_3,\quad \ell_4=X_1+X_2+X_3.

Entry 712 independently leaves the mixed triple costalk on the quadratic normal cover η2=T2\eta^2=T_2, whose binary-quadratic discriminant is

D=ℓ1ℓ2ℓ3ℓ4.D=\ell_1\ell_2\ell_3\ell_4.

Common-cover identity

The two square classes coincide:

D=(ℓ1ℓ4)2R.\boxed{D=(\ell_1\ell_4)^2R.}

Therefore the minimal pair cover

ρ2=R\boxed{\rho^2=R}

also contains

D=(ℓ1ℓ4)ρ.\sqrt D=(\ell_1\ell_4)\rho.

It is consequently the splitting cover of the mixed triple quadratic as well.

Explicit splitting

Set

A=X12−X22−X32,s=D.A=X_1^2-X_2^2-X_3^2, \qquad s=\sqrt D.

Then

4X32T2=(2X32ν2+(A+s)ν3)(2X32ν2+(A−s)ν3).\boxed{ 4X_3^2T_2= \bigl(2X_3^2\nu_2+(A+s)\nu_3\bigr) \bigl(2X_3^2\nu_2+(A-s)\nu_3\bigr). }

The deck involution ρ↦−ρ\rho\mapsto-\rho exchanges these two linear normal factors. Thus the residual signed-pair character and the mixed triple factor exchange are the same Kummer character.

Consequence

The pair and triple sectors do not require two unrelated coefficient extensions. They meet canonically on one source-determined double cover:

one signed-energy Kummer cover+pair/triple coefficient objects.\boxed{ \text{one signed-energy Kummer cover} +\text{pair/triple coefficient objects}.}

This is the first legitimate common coefficient carrier for the extension proposed in Entry 712. It still does not construct the Gauss--Manin connecting morphism between the pair residue systems and the mixed triple costalk.

Consequence for Q\mathcal Q

The cover ramifies only on the four signed-energy factors. Its square class is coprime to Q\mathcal Q. Therefore any later Q\mathcal Q-support must occur in the connecting morphism or its descent, not in this Kummer coefficient cover.

Evidence

Next falsifier

Pull the minus pair, strict plus pair, and mixed triple costalk to ρ2=R\rho^2=R. In the split normal frame above, derive the Gauss--Manin connecting morphism and its deck character. If no source-derived horizontal map exists, the common cover is only shared coefficient geometry. If one exists, compute its descent obstruction before testing Q\mathcal Q.

View source on GitHub