722 — No Declared Simple Pole Splits the Infinity-Gysin Extension Through Degree Ten
Question
Entry 721 excluded polynomial splittings of the horizontal infinity--Gysin extension through degree ten. Does a rational splitting
exist at the same numerator bound for any single predeclared source divisor?
Typed equation
For each factor (f), independently, clearing the denominator in
gives
The logarithmic derivative is retained in both directions. No products of distinct factors and no fitted denominator are admitted.
Census
Over , search all four entries of a polynomial numerator (N) through total degree ten, separately for
No simple-pole splitting exists for any factor:
Each factor used the same training rule and was independently checked at 256 points in both directions.
Consequence
The first rational extension census does not privilege . Neither nor any ordinary single boundary factor supports a simple-pole splitting within the frozen bound. Thus the surviving possibilities are:
- higher numerator degree;
- higher pole order;
- a mixed denominator;
- an intrinsically nonsplit differential-module extension.
The result remains bounded and finite-field; it is not a nonsplitting theorem.
Evidence
- Entry 721;
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/main.rs;research/benincasa/marici-gm/gysin-single-pole-census-d10.json;- allocator claim
seqclaim-50aabb078b8dde7b2a93a39e.
Next falsifier
Before enlarging the brute-force search, compute the divisorwise local extension class (or its residue obstruction). A nonzero local obstruction can exclude arbitrary pole order on a factor, whereas another global degree census would only increase a bound.