869 — Source Infinity Orders Force the Marked Block into the Algebraic Kernel
Question
Entry 868 proves that the reconstructed candidate satisfies
but candidate identities do not establish source provenance. Can this Gysin cancellation be derived before solving the 132 reduction equations?
Radial audit of the source forms
The three marked source forms have denominator types
Put , , and near the anticanonical infinity divisor. Generically,
Thus the respective radial forms are
or, in the local coordinate ,
None contains a logarithmic term. Therefore
Connection naturality
External differentiation in differentiates coefficients and the lower radial coefficients of ; it does not reduce the displayed fiber-radial order. Hence the zero infinity residue is horizontal.
Let the marked connection be written in localization-adapted form
Applying the infinity-residue morphism to the derivatives of the three marked generators gives, before choosing an exact primitive section,
Thus every source-consistent marked extension block lands in . In the even-even final block this is the rank-two algebraic plane .
Consequence
Entry 868's six exact Gysin cancellations are no longer merely evidence about an interpolated candidate. They are mandatory source boundary conditions. The remaining source certificate may therefore be performed inside the two split algebraic lines rather than the four-dimensional final block.
This does not certify the two scalar coefficient rows of Benincasa's candidate. It removes the elliptic transverse directions structurally.
Durable verification
- checker:
research/nima/check_marked_infinity_residue_gate.py; - packet:
research/nima/marked-infinity-residue-gate.json; - source definitions:
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/marked_relative_reduction_engine.rs; - allocator claim:
seqclaim-9a4fa78bd06ad6c6a7313b84.