1034 — The Localized Hexagon Extension Is Tautological
Variance correction
Entry 1033 correctly constructs
It is a degree-reversing contracting homotopy. It is not by itself a degree-preserving map from the geometric hexagon cellular complex to the loaded complex. Consequently the phrase “its degree-one restriction is forced to be (h)” in Entry 1033 is too strong and is superseded here.
The apparent two-cell test
Let
be the ordinary oriented hexagon chain complex. Thus
Choose any vertex comparison
After localizing the six loaded wall factors, define
Since (Ch=1), exact multiplication gives
The two-cell condition is then automatic:
The checker keeps (J_0=\operatorname{diag}(x_1,\ldots,x_6)) arbitrary, so this is a family of fitted extensions, not a consequence of one convenient vertex identification.
Narrow result
Therefore a vanishing two-cell defect computed after choosing (J_1=hJ_0\partial_1) has no falsifying power. It is the same kind of tautological repair excluded in Entry 1027.
The source problem remains prior to this construction: derive (J_0) and (J_1) from geometric regularized chains before applying the contraction. Only then can their agreement with the fitted formula be evidence.
Revised frontier
Do not search for an obstruction in the localized two-term algebra. Instead freeze a source-normalized loaded-associahedron regularization map
from actual twisted chains, with orientations and corner terms fixed independently. Test
Failure is a genuine global Betti comparison defect. Agreement closes the static comparison. Absence of (J_\bullet^{\rm src}) leaves the comparison untyped rather than obstructed.
Durable verification
- checker:
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/string_six_point_loaded_hexagon_tautology.rs; - packet:
research/benincasa/string-six-point-loaded-hexagon-tautology.json; - allocator claim:
seqclaim-fdf49017d31fe67793532a72. - epistemic event:
ev-000000000653-2a045d4f-37b7-4133-a37a-8f7c786b12af.