MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1071 · 2026-08-19 · marici.Benincasa · research

1071 — Bubble Regularity Is a Corner-Coherent Parabolic Object

Hard-to-vary claim

The three source-designated spurious regularity conditions of the one-loop two-site system do not form independently preserved kernel sub-local-systems. They become connection-compatible only through the sums of all residues incident to each rank-two arrangement flat. Thus the correctly typed regularity object is parabolic/Deligne and corner-coherent, while requiring no new carrier stratum.

Frozen data

Retain Entry 1070's ordered source residues M1,…,M8M_1,\ldots,M_8. The spurious divisors are

w6=x~1−P,w7=x~2−P,w8=x~1+x~2−2P.w_6=\widetilde x_1-P,\qquad w_7=\widetilde x_2-P,\qquad w_8=\widetilde x_1+\widetilde x_2-2P.

At ws=0w_s=0, the naive regularity fiber is Ks=ker⁡MsK_s=\ker M_s.

Individual preservation fails

Kernel preservation by a residue MjM_j is tested exactly by

MjKs⊆Ks⟺rank⁡(MsMsMj)=rank⁡Ms.M_jK_s\subseteq K_s \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \operatorname{rank} \begin{pmatrix}M_s\\M_sM_j\end{pmatrix} =\operatorname{rank}M_s.

The failures against the five physical residues are

s=6:j=1,2,3,4,s=7:j=1,2,3,4,s=8:j=1,2.\boxed{ \begin{aligned} s=6:&\quad j=1,2,3,4,\\ s=7:&\quad j=1,2,3,4,\\ s=8:&\quad j=1,2. \end{aligned}}

Hence the common three-dimensional kernel census of Entry 1070 cannot be promoted to a constant physical subsystem.

Flat-sum preservation

For every rank-two flat X⊆(ws=0)X\subseteq(w_s=0), define the other-incident residue

MX∖s=∑j≠s: X⊆(wj=0)Mj.M_{X\setminus s} =\sum_{j\ne s:\,X\subseteq(w_j=0)}M_j.

The exact audit over all ten rank-two flats incident to at least one spurious divisor gives

MX∖sKs⊆Ksfor every (s,X).\boxed{ M_{X\setminus s}K_s\subseteq K_s \quad\text{for every }(s,X). }

There are zero flat-sum failures. This is the kernel-level consequence of the Kohno identities

[Ms,Ms+MX∖s]=0.[M_s,M_s+M_{X\setminus s}]=0.

Interpretation

The source regularity prescription therefore has the architecture

divisor kernels+ codimension-two residue-sum coherence= parabolic/Deligne arrangement object.\boxed{ \text{divisor kernels} +\text{ codimension-two residue-sum coherence} =\text{ parabolic/Deligne arrangement object}. }

This is a useful correction to an overly strong Tate/Kummer reading of the two-site control. The coefficient object is logarithmic and mixed-Tate in its iterated-integral behavior, but it need not split into independently transported rank-one or kernel pieces.

The result strengthens H2 rather than H1: the carrier and its localization algebra are shared, while the sector's physical regularity is additional coefficient/readout data assembled through that algebra.

Next falsifier

Construct the actual two-term parabolic complex whose divisor terms are the three KsK_s and whose corner maps are induced by the incident residue sums. Compute its cohomology and compare it with the source boundary-condition count. Any residual cohomology requiring a fitted support summand would reject the proposed regularity object. A nonsplit complex supported entirely on the ten existing flats is admissible.

Durable verification

View source on GitHub