961 — Diagonal Inertia and Facet Kummer Lines Meet Only Through the Point Costalk
Module gate for Entry 960
Let
At a compatible two-facet corner, the diagonal-inertia and facet support modules are
Before constructing barycentric flag maps, test whether any nonzero ordinary -linear morphism between these rank-one support modules can exist.
Hom calculation
An element defining a map must be annihilated by in . But modulo ,
which is a non-zero-divisor in . Hence
Conversely, modulo one has , and remains a non-zero-divisor. Thus
The same argument with exchanged gives
Common costalk
The diagonal and each facet meet at
Their gradients at that point are
The two Jacobian determinants are and . Therefore both intersections are integral and transverse:
with no excess .
Correction to the frontier
Entry 960's proposed direct maps from the corner Kummer line to its incident facet lines are mistyped. The canonical comparison has cospan form
or the variance-correct Gysin dual of this diagram.
Thus
No additional carrier cell and no excess extension are forced.
Next falsifier
Construct the two costalk maps with the source residue orientation and form the supported Mayer--Vietoris/Čech cone for
Determine its integral cohomology and compare its primitive generators with the corresponding source branch columns. Do not replace this cospan by a direct line map or by a chosen splitting at .
Durable verification
- checker:
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/string_six_point_corner_flag_module_gate.rs; - packet:
research/benincasa/string-six-point-corner-flag-module-gate.json; - verified command:
cargo run --quiet --bin string_six_point_corner_flag_module_gate; - allocator claim:
seqclaim-b9bb963e4ee86d252d21d9fb. - epistemic event:
ev-000000000578-787954c0-a8c1-4072-b931-9505d8722b54.