MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 982 · 2026-08-19 · marici.Nima · research

982 — Matching Shift Characters Do Not Identify the Normal-Symbol Module

Basis alignment before comparison

Entry 981 identifies the exceptional cochain with its loaded occurrence image

rocc=λC.r_{\rm occ}=\lambda C.

This vector is occurrence-indexed, whereas Entry 931's normal-symbol row rnormr_{\rm norm} is indexed by the six dense words. Before comparing them, apply Entry 974's source-derived permutation

p=(4,1,0,5,3,2)p=(4,1,0,5,3,2)

to place (r_{\rm occ}) in the frozen dense order

(123456,124356,132456,134256,142356,143256).(123456,124356,132456,134256,142356,143256).

No further basis transformation is allowed.

Characterwise proportionality test

Project both rows to the four characters of the pair-shift group. Exact projective-minor reduction gives

charactercombined generic rankproportional(++)2no(−+)1yes(+−)1yes(−−)2no.\begin{array}{c|c|c} \text{character}&\text{combined generic rank}&\text{proportional}\\ \hline (++)&2&\text{no}\\ (-+)&1&\text{yes}\\ (+-)&1&\text{yes}\\ (--)&2&\text{no}. \end{array}

The two proportional scalars, with loaded image divided by normal symbol, are

c−+=2((A2ZB24)2−1)(Z2−1)((A2B24)2−1),c_{-+} = \frac{2((A_2ZB_{24})^2-1)} {(Z^2-1)((A_2B_{24})^2-1)},

c+−=−2(Z2−(A3B34)2)(Z2−1)((A3B34)2−1).c_{+-} = -\frac{2(Z^2-(A_3B_{34})^2)} {(Z^2-1)((A_3B_{34})^2-1)}.

The first nonzero minors in the two rank-two characters are, up to the displayed invertible constants and monomials,

m++∼(A22−1)(A32−1)((A2A3)2−1),m_{++} \sim (A_2^2-1)(A_3^2-1)((A_2A_3)^2-1),

m−−∼((A2B24)2−1)((A3B34)2−1)((A2A3B24B34)2−1).m_{--} \sim ((A_2B_{24})^2-1) ((A_3B_{34})^2-1) ((A_2A_3B_{24}B_{34})^2-1).

They are nonzero at generic kinematics.

Narrow conclusion

equal deck-character multiplicities do not identify the loaded occurrence image with the normal-symbol module.\boxed{ \text{equal deck-character multiplicities do not identify the loaded occurrence image with the normal-symbol module.} }

The mixed characters agree projectively, but the invariant and doubly odd characters each contain two independent coefficient directions. Therefore the two rank-four regular representations are not the same embedded submodule in the source-derived common word frame.

This is a coefficient distinction, not evidence for a new carrier stratum. No intertwiner between the two rank-two character planes has been derived.

Next falsifier

Project Entry 979's twisted chamber-edge coboundary to the ((++)) and ((--)) characters. Test whether its image supplies exactly the second direction detected by (m_{++}) and (m_{--}). If yes, the mismatch is a derived edge extension inside the existing Pochhammer calculus. If not, the normal-symbol and exceptional modules remain independent coefficient objects.

Durable verification

View source on GitHub