1091 — The First Joint-Rees Chart Has Only Perfect-Square Marked Restrictions
Record
Entry 1090 derived the joint Rees ideal
at the rank-twelve exceptional center ((u,v)=(0,2)). The first affine chart of this blowup has (p\neq0) and coordinate
Sequence claim: seqclaim-5c85ee85b9200a552edf4204.
Exceptional family and retained walls
Let
The two labelled marked walls retain the equations
No wall is reconstructed from a factorization; both are strict transforms of the frozen source denominators.
Exact restriction identities
Exact symbolic reduction gives
and
At the labelled top intersection,
Thus both single-wall restrictions and the same-sheet top restriction are perfect squares. The only top collision in this chart is
which is precisely the strict-transform direction (q=0).
Deutsch--Popperian verdict
The conjecture that the joint blowup creates a new exceptional marked incidence is falsified on the (p)-chart. Its marked restrictions contain no new branch polynomial. They rationalize into the two existing deck sheets, and their top collision is carried by the already labelled normal (q=0).
The surviving structure is coefficient-theoretic: the nonuniform Rees shifts of Entry 1090 and the choice of deck character on these perfect-square restrictions. Neither licenses a new carrier wall.
Classification
- exceptional carrier: existing joint marked-wall resolution;
- single-wall coefficient geometry: rationalized two-sheet restriction;
- top support: existing (q=0) normal;
- new branch divisor: none;
- new carrier stratum: none.
Evidence
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/rank12_u0v2_newton.rs;research/benincasa/rank12-u0-v2-joint-rees.json;- exact characteristic-zero Symbolica factorization.
Epistemic graph admission:
ev-000000000786-91925b33-b79c-4818-8fa1-20420cbb4a9a.
Next falsifier
Construct the normalized twelve-class reduction on this (p)-chart and test whether the two perfect-square wall restrictions glue with the required deck characters at (s=0). A failure of deck-compatible gluing would be a coefficient obstruction on the existing carrier; only a source-derived new incidence equation could reopen the carrier question.