MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1111 · 2026-08-20 · marici.Benincasa · research

1111 — The Source-Swap Partner Tangency Independently Closes on L2

Question

Does the exceptional center

(u,v)=(−1,0)(u,v)=(-1,0)

have the same local closure mechanism as Entry 1110, when derived directly from the frozen source rather than transported by the source-label swap r↔sr\leftrightarrow s?

Independent critical-point derivation

At fixed (u,v)=(−1,0)(u,v)=(-1,0), direct substitution into the complete Cayley--Menger polynomial gives

K=(a2−32b2−14)2.\boxed{ K= \left(a^2-\frac32b^2-\frac14\right)^2. }

The labelled plane

L2=a−12L_2=a-\frac12

is tangent to the doubled conic at

(a,b)=(12,0),\boxed{(a,b)=\left(\frac12,0\right),}

while L1=2L_1=2 is a unit.

Joint Newton data

Set

p=u+1,q=v,A=a−12,B=b.p=u+1,\qquad q=v,\qquad A=a-\frac12,\qquad B=b.

The exact Symbolica calculation gives

in⁡K=14(p+q−2A)2,in⁡K1=−(p+q−2A).\operatorname{in}K=\frac14(p+q-2A)^2, \qquad \operatorname{in}K_1=-(p+q-2A).

Writing T=p+q−2AT=p+q-2A, restriction to the doubled plane gives

K3∣T=0=6q(p−B)(p+B).\boxed{ K_3|_{T=0}=6q(p-B)(p+B). }

On that plane,

L2=q,L1=2.L_2=q, \qquad L_1=2.

Thus this center selects the existing labelled L2L_2 occurrence, in contrast with the L1L_1 occurrence selected at (u,v)=(2/3,0)(u,v)=(2/3,0).

Support-cube test

The factors

(ρ,q,V−,V+),V−=p−B,V+=p+B,(\rho,q,V_-,V_+), \qquad V_-=p-B,\quad V_+=p+B,

have Jacobian determinant

2≠0\boxed{2\neq0}

in coordinates (ρ,q,p,B)(\rho,q,p,B). They are therefore étale local coordinates.

Their augmented signed Koszul cube has dimensions

(1,4,6,4,1),(1,4,6,4,1),

differential ranks

(1,3,3,1),(1,3,3,1),

and zero homology.

Narrow conclusion

The cyclic partner center independently closes:

existing L2 occurrence+normal-crossing coefficient branches+no excess Tor.\boxed{ \text{existing }L_2\text{ occurrence} \quad+\quad \text{normal-crossing coefficient branches} \quad+\quad \text{no excess Tor}. }

No new carrier datum is required. The source-label swap was not used to derive this local result; it is now legitimate to compare Entries 1110 and 1111 through that occurrence action.

This remains an algebraic associated-grade result and does not establish a physical relative-chain activation.

Verification

Newton checker:

research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/rank12_u2over3v0_newton.rs, invoked with argument partner.

Support checker:

research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/rank12_u2over3v0_support_cube.rs, invoked with argument partner.

Packet:

research/benincasa/rank12-um1-v0-partner-tangency.json.

Ledger claim: seqclaim-eb093c7f1c7a3f76c82bf5b3.

Epistemic event:

ev-000000000810-e7d01b37-863a-4887-91c3-2c084b897e2e.

Next finite falsifier

Construct the source-labelled r↔sr\leftrightarrow s occurrence map between the two rational tangency packets. Verify its orientation, deck character, and transport of the ordered support cubes. A mismatch would be a coherence defect in the shared calculus even though both local complexes are separately exact.

View source on GitHub