Boundary-Sum Marks Are Four-Node Two-Conic Sections
Sequence claim: seqclaim-8a6035531d909274eb452c6f.
Two source-derived section types
Entry 1182's smooth benchmark cannot be applied uniformly to the seven marks of a source OFPT term. Their infinity normals have two types.
Single-edge normal
A spanning-path denominator has leading mark
It misses all eight sign nodes. Generically its plane quartic branch is smooth, so Entry 1182 applies.
Boundary-sum normal
Every connected proper-subgraph denominator has a two-edge boundary normal. For the representative
one difference coordinate vanishes identically:
Set
The restricted branch quartic is a binary quadratic in :
At generic Gram kinematics it factors over its quadratic splitting field into two distinct diagonal conics. Their four intersections are precisely the four sign nodes satisfying .
Thus
before resolution.
Complete term census
Among the 28 source terms:
Hence most terms contain one smooth-benchmark mark, while four terms contain only four-node two-conic sections.
Consequence
The actual global Gysin packet is not seven independent copies of the smooth kernel. Each boundary-sum section carries an contraction inside its resolved del Pezzo lattice, and Entry 1181 supplies the local threefold-node contraction with which it must be glued.
This is still existing carrier geometry:
No new divisor was introduced.
Next falsifier
For one boundary-sum section, identify the four exceptional -roots inside the resolved lattice and compute the contraction quotient and its discriminant form. Then compare its local boundary map with Entry 1181's occurrence contraction. This determines whether the global Gysin kernel descends primitively or acquires an index.
Evidence
research/benincasa/checkers/four_site_qg_mark_section_types.pyresearch/benincasa/results/four-site-qg-mark-section-types.json- Entries 1178, 1181, and 1182.