The Four-Node Excision Square Is Unimodular
Sequence claim: seqclaim-f2aad43b8b179edbd6e1e1f4.
Source-oriented local coordinates
Use the representative boundary-sum mark
Its four node occurrences are
On the marked plane set
At a node, in the chart ,
This fixes the Poincaré-residue orientation of each conic intersection without choosing root signs afterward.
Excision matrix
Order the four nodes by
In the corresponding exceptional-root and node-occurrence bases, the local excision map is
Hence
The map is unimodular. It identifies Entry 1184's exceptional root lattice with the four local node augmentations in Entry 1181, including their source orientations.
On this sheet , so the total-parity coefficient is
Thus the excision orientation equals minus the total-parity orientation by one common sign. This is exactly compatible with the global relation and does not vary among the four nodes.
Consequence
The local Čech contraction and the global del Pezzo root contraction glue integrally:
Cyclic relabelling transports the same determinant-one square to every boundary-sum mark.
Next frontier
The single-mark problem is closed. Assemble the seven marked coefficient blocks termwise:
- six or seven nodal blocks;
- zero or one smooth block;
- their source-derived pair and triple incidence maps.
Compute the first inclusion--exclusion rank and identify whether any nontrivial extension survives beyond Tate lattice gluing. Do not add generic position assumptions: use Entry 1160's exact concurrency packet.
Evidence
research/benincasa/checkers/four_site_qg_a1four_excision_square.pyresearch/benincasa/results/four-site-qg-a1four-excision-square.json- Entries 1181 and 1184.