The Literal Four-Site Physical Chain Does Not Activate the Residual Extension
Sequence claim: seqclaim-6442c7897a32de87cf40ae12.
Frozen physical support
Use the general OFPT denominator valuation, without requiring an expanded four-site term from the primary paper:
and, for the opened-edge occurrence appearing in every residual triple,
All coefficients are nonnegative and the literal Bunch--Davies integration chamber has (X_i>0) and physical edge variables nonnegative.
Exact eight-term audit
Each of Entries 1192--1197's eight residual classes is supported on a labelled triple containing exactly one (q_{\mathcal G\setminus e}) wall. Therefore
throughout the physical interior, independently of the other two partial energies. Hence
The supported pairing with both regular (C_4) orbits is zero before analytic continuation.
Closure
On the nonnegative closure,
forces
Thus the first possible contact lies only on the already frozen all-site-soft plus labelled edge-soft support. No new physical wall or carrier cell is indicated.
Combined status
The residual object is:
- nonzero algebraically;
- horizontal as a Gram-Kummer associated grade;
- nonsplit over elliptic relative cohomology;
- supported only on frozen relative discriminants;
- invisible to the literal positive physical chain.
This is not a contradiction. It is another explicit instance of
Stop condition and redirect
A nonzero physical class now requires a source-derived analytically continued relative cycle on the all-soft/edge-soft closure, including its orientation, regulator hierarchy, and lift-independence. The frozen four-site packet supplies no such selection. Do not choose one.
The algebraic branch is closed at generic support. The next independent cosmology falsifier should use a source sector whose physical relative chain is explicitly frozen, rather than extending this class by hand.
Artifacts
research/benincasa/checkers/four_site_qg_residual_physical_support.pyresearch/benincasa/results/four-site-qg-residual-physical-support.json