The Five-Site Marked Complements Have Seven Geometric OS Types
Sequence claim: seqclaim-946ddd98f5ffce1b6ad531d1.
Geometric versus occurrence generators
Entry 1201 freezes twelve matroid profiles after retaining occurrence depth on every flat. To compute the geometric hyperplane-complement cohomology, use one (d\log q) generator per geometric hyperplane. Coincident source labels do not create independent logarithmic forms:
Their occurrence multiplicities remain external labelled data for later coefficient and transition maps.
Exact Orlik--Solomon calculation
For every term, enumerate all no-broken-circuit subsets using Entry 1201's complete minimal-circuit list. The central rank-five OS Hilbert series has the Euler factor (1+t). Dividing by it gives the projective complement in
The twelve incidence profiles collapse to seven geometric cohomology types:
Each term count is a union of free (C_5)-orbits.
Meaning
The distinction between carrier geometry and occurrence presentation is now quantitative:
Collapsing occurrences before transport would lose source labels. Duplicating them as OS generators would instead manufacture complement cohomology. The correct architecture is a geometric OS carrier equipped with labelled occurrence modules.
Next falsifier
Construct the occurrence module over each of the seven OS complexes. Derive its transition maps from the complement-label identifications and test cyclic descent. Reject any construction that changes the geometric Betti vectors or introduces a generator solely because two source labels coincide.
Only after this descent may the five-site Cayley--Menger double-cover coefficient system be attached.
Artifacts
research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_qg_projective_os.pyresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-qg-projective-os.json