Entry 1224 — The Five-Site Physical Sheet Is Equivariant but Does Not Descend
Question
Entry 1223 established strict deck descent of the intrinsic rank-32 Kummer connection. It is tempting to demand the same invariant descent from the physical Bunch–Davies cycle. That demand is too strong.
On a real chamber where all five physical roots are positive, let
denote the locally selected positive-sheet lift of the source integration cycle. The deck group is
Exact orbit statement
Every nontrivial deck element changes at least one root sign. Therefore
and
The physical coordinates and the current orientation are fixed by deck transport. Thus the 32 continuations form a coherent regular permutation local system.
At a branch stratum indexed by , where for , sheets differing only by signs in have the same restriction. The number of restricted sheet classes is
The checker verifies this for all 32 branch subsets, with 1,024 group-action and 7,776 restriction identities.
Trace versus physical evaluation
The orbit trace
is deck-invariant. The source-selected physical chain is not.
Hence
The physical readout is evaluation on a locally selected chamber vector, not projection to deck invariants. Replacing it by the trace would change the observable.
Classification
This is not a failure of H2. It identifies the precise layer at which cosmology retains physical sheet information after carrier and connection descent.
Artifacts
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/five_site_physical_sheet_orbit.rsresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-physical-sheet-orbit.json
Next falsifier
Construct the pairing between the rank-32 Kummer coefficient system and the regular Betti orbit. Test whether its deck covariance makes the scalar chamber evaluation independent of continuation once the source endpoint and (i\epsilon) data are transported together. A failure there would be physical monodromy or regulator dependence, not a carrier-incidence defect.