1417 — The Cyclic Coefficient Factor Closes to the Regular Representation
Status
Replicated two-prime modular covariance test.
Refinement of Entry 1416
Entry 1416 establishes the pointwise factorization
The Cut factor is (C_5)-invariant. This does not imply that ( ho) is an invariant scalar line.
Cyclicly closed directions
For each generic augmentation-base point, rotate the complete labelled Kummer coordinates through
At the first tested point, the five residual values are
and
Both vectors are nonconstant and have nonzero coordinate sum.
Representation rank
For both primes,
Hence the cyclotomic polynomial
is irreducible over the tested field. A nonconstant cyclic vector has a nonzero augmentation component, while nonzero coordinate sum supplies the trivial component.
Therefore its cyclic span is
Rejected smaller models
Across forty generic directions, ( ho) is not represented by:
- a (C_5)-invariant quadratic in (s_i=y_i^2);
- a (C_5)-invariant quartic in the Kummer roots (y_i).
Thus the coefficient datum is not an invariant scalar polynomial of the first source-forced degrees.
Narrow consequence
The current finite architecture is
The Carrier factor remains existing Cut incidence. The sector-specific coefficient object has cyclic rank five under closure, rather than rank one.
This refines, but does not retract, Entry 1416: its pointwise scalar ( ho_d) is a coordinate evaluation of a larger cyclic coefficient object.
Next finite falsifier
Determine whether the rank-five orbit is merely the induced occurrence module generated by one labelled source residue, or whether its augmentation component survives after the physical cyclic descent. Construct the source-labelled transition matrix before taking invariants.
Artifacts:
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/five_site_cyclic_kummer_ibp_pilot.rsresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-cyclic-coefficient-orbit.json
Allocator claim: seqclaim-4ed437fa688caa44cfca6131.