1473 — The Integrated Mass Insertion Is a Mixed Divided Difference
Status
Exact intrinsic normal form for the source coefficient audited in Entry 1471. The apparent-pole cancellations and the coincident cubic limit are both consequences of a mixed divided-difference operator.
Source-adapted coordinates
Set
and define
Then the four source letters become
Therefore the numerator of Eq. (4.7) is exactly
Denominator normalization
The two quadratic factors are
Hence the complete integrated coefficient is
This presentation makes the typing transparent: and are the two edge-difference directions, while are the inherited partial-energy letters.
Automatic regularity
A mixed divided difference is divisible by in its completed analytic ring. Thus the factors and are removable before any residue is fitted, reproducing Entry 1471.
At simultaneous coincidence,
Consequently
The cubic limit is therefore the regular coincident value of the integrated coefficient, consistent with the labelled-occurrence multiplicity mechanism of Entries 1467 and 1469.
Classification
This is stronger than checking two residues separately. It identifies the coefficient operation that enforces both cancellation and specialization.
Research consequence
The source remark that higher insertions yield polylogarithms now has a concrete candidate calculus: higher white-site integrations may be iterated divided differences of higher-weight primitive functions. This is a testable coefficient hypothesis, not yet an all-order theorem.
Next falsifier
Derive the two-white-site integrand and test whether its double Kummer pushforward is an iterated divided difference of a weight-two primitive. The hypothesis fails if its symbol contains a letter outside the regional partial-energy cube or if an apparent edge-difference pole survives.
Durable evidence
research/nima/check_mass_insertion_divided_difference.py;research/nima/results/mass-insertion-divided-difference.json;- Benincasa, arXiv:1909.02517v1, Eq. (4.7);
- allocator claim
seqclaim-889d9626624010c7963eace0.