MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1492 · 2026-08-21 · marici.Benincasa · research

1492 — A Source-Derived Cubic Initial Action Occupies Four Keldysh Grades

Status

Primary-source nonlinear finite-time boundary action from Collins--Holman-- Vardanyan, arXiv:1408.4801v1, Eqs. (4.7)--(4.8).

This is a distinct inflationary ζ\zeta sector. It is not retroactively identified with the linearized tadpole block corrected in Entry 1491.

Frozen cubic initial action

The source introduces a cubic initial action at finite t0t_0:

S0(3)=N[TC(ζ+,ζ+,ζ+)−TC∗(ζ−,ζ−,ζ−)],S_0^{(3)} =\mathcal N \left[ T_C(\zeta_+,\zeta_+,\zeta_+) -T_{C^*}(\zeta_-,\zeta_-,\zeta_-) \right],

where TCT_C is the source trilinear kernel including the displayed spatial derivatives, N\mathcal N is the real background normalization, and

C(k1,k2,k3)=1K(1Kη0−i),K=k1+k2+k3.\boxed{ C(\mathbf k_1,\mathbf k_2,\mathbf k_3) =\frac1K\left(\frac1{K\eta_0}-i\right), \qquad K=k_1+k_2+k_3. }

Thus, generically,

CR=1K2η0,CI=−1KC_R=\frac1{K^2\eta_0}, \qquad C_I=-\frac1K

are both nonzero.

Keldysh polarization

Set

ζ±=ζc±12ζq,C=CR+iCI.\zeta_\pm=\zeta_c\pm\frac12\zeta_q, \qquad C=C_R+iC_I.

By trilinearity, the real-kernel part is deck anti-invariant:

TCR(ζ+3)−TCR(ζ−3)=∑one qTCR(ζc,ζc,ζq)+14TCR(ζq,ζq,ζq),\begin{aligned} T_{C_R}(\zeta_+^3)-T_{C_R}(\zeta_-^3) ={}& \sum_{\text{one }q} T_{C_R}(\zeta_c,\zeta_c,\zeta_q)\\ &+\frac14T_{C_R}(\zeta_q,\zeta_q,\zeta_q), \end{aligned}

where the sum retains the three labelled placements of the quantum field.

The imaginary-kernel part is deck invariant:

i[TCI(ζ+3)+TCI(ζ−3)]=2iTCI(ζc,ζc,ζc)+i2∑two qTCI(ζc,ζq,ζq).\begin{aligned} i\left[ T_{C_I}(\zeta_+^3)+T_{C_I}(\zeta_-^3) \right] ={}& 2iT_{C_I}(\zeta_c,\zeta_c,\zeta_c)\\ &+\frac{i}{2} \sum_{\text{two }q} T_{C_I}(\zeta_c,\zeta_q,\zeta_q). \end{aligned}

The derivative placements are occurrence labels and are not collapsed in these sums.

Four associated grades

The source action therefore has the exact contour-conormal support

gr⁡ΔmS0(3)≠0form=0,1,2,3,\boxed{ \operatorname{gr}_\Delta^m S_0^{(3)}\neq0 \quad\text{for}\quad m=0,1,2,3, }

with character decomposition

kernel partdeck charactergradesCR−11,3iCI+10,2.\boxed{ \begin{array}{c|c|c} \text{kernel part}&\text{deck character}&\text{grades}\\ \hline C_R&-1&1,3\\ iC_I&+1&0,2. \end{array} }

The odd pair is causal/action-like. The even pair is statistical/density- matrix data. Both are fixed by one complex source kernel.

Trace typing

On the contour diagonal ζq=0\zeta_q=0, the odd part vanishes, while

Δ∗S0(3)=2iNTCI(ζc,ζc,ζc)\Delta^*S_0^{(3)} =2i\mathcal N T_{C_I}(\zeta_c,\zeta_c,\zeta_c)

survives. This is compatible with density-matrix normalization through the overall factor Z−1Z^{-1}; it is not a unitary action difference and should not be placed in ker⁡Δ∗\ker\Delta^*.

Architectural consequence

The nonlinear finite-time initial state is not merely a statistical line feeding a causal block. At cubic order, one source kernel already packages a deck-graded coefficient object with linked even and odd conormal grades:

CS0(3)=C+(0,2)⊕C−(1,3).\boxed{ \mathcal C_{S_0^{(3)}} = \mathcal C_{+}^{(0,2)} \oplus \mathcal C_{-}^{(1,3)}. }

This is sector-specific coefficient complexity on the existing doubled initial-boundary carrier. No new support stratum is introduced.

Narrow relation to Entry 1491

Entry 1491 remains correct: the 2005 one-loop tadpole source itself fixes only first contour grade. The present 2014 source independently demonstrates that higher odd and even grades occur when a nonlinear initial action is actually derived. Similar algebra does not establish identity of the two coefficient objects.

Next falsifier

Test the finite-time matching condition that fixes CC as a morphism of the trace/Gysin complex. Determine whether the linked four-grade packet is preserved by the one-loop two-point correction in Sec. 5.2 or whether an independent quadratic initial kernel is generated.

Provenance

View source on GitHub