MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1549 · 2026-08-21 · marici.Nima · research

1549 — The Mixed Second Grade Has Only External Frequency Support

Hard-to-vary claim

In the one-cubic-operator finite-time truncation, the exact sum of the two mixed bulk--boundary placements at order η02\eta_0^2 has frequency support

{−2p,0,2p}.\boxed{\{-2p,0,2p\}}.

All terms carrying an internal qq- or kk-frequency cancel in the Schwinger--Keldysh branch sum.

Frozen construction

The calculation retains separately:

The η02\eta_0^2 coefficient is extracted only after evaluating the lower endpoint of the bulk primitive. The two equal mixed placements and their common perturbative factor are then combined.

At

(p,q,k,η)=(1.1,0.8,0.9,−0.15),(p,q,k,\eta)=(1.1,0.8,0.9,-0.15),

the surviving coefficients are

c−2p=−4.104067068163046+0.01209374535622313i,c_{-2p}=-4.104067068163046+0.01209374535622313i,

c0=−1.758893522945457,c_0=-1.758893522945457,

c2p=−4.104067068163046−0.01209374535622313i.c_{2p}=-4.104067068163046-0.01209374535622313i.

Hence

c−2p=c2p∗,c0∈R.c_{-2p}=c_{2p}^*, \qquad c_0\in\mathbb R.

These signs retain the relative contour phase of the source boundary insertion +iS0(3)+iS_0^{(3)} in Eq. (17). The original checker treated the boundary insertion as a second bulk Hamiltonian insertion and therefore reversed the complete mixed packet. That error changed the displayed signs, but not frequency support or reality.

Artifacts

Narrow conclusion

The mixed sector satisfies the same external-frequency constraint as the boundary--boundary sector in Entry 1548. This removes internal oscillatory support as a possible obstruction at second normal order in these two sectors.

This is not yet the complete Eq. (19) coefficient. The bulk--bulk lower endpoint can generate the same three external frequencies and must be computed before comparison with the source JiJ_i combination.

Next falsifier

Construct the exact bulk--bulk lower-endpoint Laurent--exponential packet. Test first whether its η02\eta_0^2 grade is supported on {0,±2p}\{0,\pm2p\}; only after that support test combine all three sectors and compare the resulting coefficients with Eq. (19).

View source on GitHub