1745 — Equal Rees Weights Are Harmless Exactly for an Invertible Leading Frame
Repeated-weight test
Let both labelled reference columns vanish to first order:
When the leading frame (F_0) is invertible,
The common Rees factor cancels. Therefore repeated weight does not itself produce a singular matrix readout, a flag, or an excess class. The labelled leading frame recovers the full based holonomy.
If the leading labels are discarded, a frame change (F_0\mapsto F_0S) acts by
Only the conjugacy class then descends. This loss is caused by forgetting occurrence data, not by the repeated Rees weight.
Rank-deficient contrast
Consider instead
Both columns have first valuation one, but the leading frame has rank one. The source-derived operation (c_2\leftarrow c_2-c_1) yields
so the complete valuation filtration has weights ((1,2)). The next jet canonically refines the apparently repeated grade; choosing a split inside the rank-one leading image would be post hoc.
Narrow result
At rank drop, the correct object is the higher-jet/Smith filtration of the source frame. This remains coefficient/readout data over the existing Cut carrier. No new carrier stratum is indicated.
Durable artifacts
research/benincasa/checkers/equal_weight_leading_frame.rsresearch/benincasa/results/equal-weight-leading-frame.jsonresearch/benincasa/equal-weight-leading-frame.md
Next falsifier
Test a rank-one leading frame whose second jet rotates along a loop. Determine whether its refined line has intrinsic monodromy and whether the full labelled jet packet recovers it without choosing a local Smith basis.