1749 — The Frozen Cosmological Source Does Not Select the Integral Parabolic Torsion
Provenance question
Entry 1748 found
The physical question is not whether the source contains some integral cycles. It is whether it canonically maps an integral source lattice into the repeated-weight parabolic reference object whose extension carries this torsion.
Frozen-source audit
The primary one-loop construction supplies twisted relative cycles
and fiberwise Gauss--Manin transport. Thus an integral Betti lattice exists on the integration-fiber side.
Two required comparisons remain absent:
- Entry 150 explicitly leaves integral normalization of the rank-nine coefficient/Gysin system open.
- Entry 781 proves that the primary Morse system is fiberwise and does not define a parameter-space current, exceptional boundary, or scalar normalization.
Entry 791 constructs a source-oriented Cayley--Menger cycle for its local finite-puncture monodromy test, but does not map that rank-one cycle into the abstract two-step reference flag of Entries 1745--1748.
Consequently no frozen-source arrow
has been derived.
Narrow result
This is a missing comparison/normalization in the coefficient layer. It is not evidence for a new carrier stratum, and it must not be repaired by simply declaring the fiber thimble lattice to be the reference lattice.
Evidence
- arXiv:2408.16386, fiberwise twisted-period/Morse construction;
- Entry 150, explicit statement that integral lattice normalization remains open;
- Entry 781, fiberwise-versus-parameter-space thimble type gate;
- Entry 791, narrowly normalized Cayley--Menger cycle monodromy.
research/benincasa/results/integral-reference-provenance-gate.json
Next falsifier
Return to a source-defined coefficient object where both Betti and de Rham integral structures already exist. Test whether a repeated-weight flag arises inside its actual nearby-cycle lattice; do not introduce an abstract reference frame first.