1775 — The Relative-Sign Character Kills the Double-Soft - Tacnode
Question
Entry 1772 identifies the repeated resultant component with the existing double-site-soft carrier corner
Does the relative-sign Hom line acquire supported cohomology from the nontransverse - collision there?
Local singularity
At , both branches are smooth, with initial forms
The exact resultant is
The last factor is one at . Hence the local intersection multiplicity is exactly two. The union of the two smooth branches is formally an tacnode:
Its ordinary Milnor number is three.
Character test
The relative Hom line has character
on the ordered meridians. It is therefore the pullback of the total-link character . The Alexander polynomial is
At the source character,
Consequently the characteristic-zero twisted local link complex is acyclic:
Consequence
The ordinary rank-three tacnode Milnor space produces no supported relative-sign extension class. Together with Entries 1770 and 1774, this closes the relative-sign -wall route on every component of the exact resultants, including both nontransverse soft corners.
This conclusion is sector-specific: it does not remove untwisted or differently twisted coefficient systems at the same carrier strata.
Durable evidence
research/benincasa/checkers/p6_d_tacnode_kummer.pyresearch/benincasa/results/p6-d-tacnode-kummer.jsonresearch/benincasa/p6-d-tacnode-kummer.md- allocator claim:
seqclaim-7a019bfaf5def0b6e7bcf0cf