1780 — The Apparent Five-Site Hessian Locus Is Only Total Energy
Question
Entry 1779 left a uniform degree-two factor after separately eliminating the two Landau equations against the first transverse-Hessian degeneracy. Does that factor describe a common higher-degenerate critical point, or can the two resultants use different roots of the auxiliary variable (p=y_i y_j)?
Frozen compatibility test
Keep the two saturated Landau cubics
and the quadratic Hessian equation
Reduce both cubics in the same quotient
Their remainders are linear in the same (p):
A shared critical point therefore requires the compatibility determinant
No root matching or numerical fitting is used.
Exact result
For all six source-labelled disjoint-cut orbit representatives,
Thus the degree-two factor retained by Entry 1779 is supported only at
the already existing total-energy locus of the cyclic slice. Away from total energy, every one of the six anomalous-threshold divisors is Hessian-nondegenerate at every compatible point detected by this audit.
Narrow conclusion
The apparent secondary factor was not a new coefficient divisor or carrier stratum. It was the existing total-energy support, exposed only after enforcing same-critical-point compatibility.
This strengthens the five-site evidence for H2:
No physical-sheet claim is made.
Durable evidence
research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_disjoint_mixed_pair_hessian.pyresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-disjoint-mixed-pair-hessian.jsonresearch/benincasa/five-site-disjoint-mixed-pair-hessian.md- allocator claim:
seqclaim-e36b8b111371a4f8a6268ed4