1788 — The Surviving Five-Site Pinch Lies in the Open Cayley–Menger Domain
Question
Entry 1787 leaves one (g_5) representative crossing with positive internal energies and same-sign Landau multipliers. Does either source-labelled root assignment lie in the full positive Cayley–Menger domain?
Quadratic assignment field
At the certified root, write
The two labelled assignments have squared radii
Every principal minor of the displacement Gram matrix is therefore of the form
Exact sign certificate
For each minor, certify nonvanishing at the isolated Landau root through its quadratic norm
The norm numerator and denominator have no zero in the exact Sturm interval. The sign of the chosen real embedding is then fixed by one interval endpoint; the displayed decimal coordinates are not used as proof.
In the ordered list
the two assignment sign vectors are
and
Thus exactly one source-labelled assignment lies in the open Cayley–Menger/Gram domain. Numerically it is the ordering
Result
Its free (C_5)-orbit gives five labelled interior candidates. The swapped assignment is excluded by the source domain and does not double the count.
Remaining falsifier
Interior location, nonzero Hessian, and same-sign multipliers establish the geometric pinch conditions. A singularity of the complete source period still requires a nonzero coefficient after summing the double residues of all frozen 180 OFPT terms containing this labelled pair.
Compute that source residue before asserting a physical discontinuity. A zero sum would be a numerator/canonical-function cancellation, not a carrier failure.
Evidence
research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_cm_domain.pyresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-cm-domain.json- allocator claim:
seqclaim-3a37b97235598324e9e1f891