1798 — The First-Soft-Rees Threshold Orbit Has No Supported Excess
Question
Entry 1797 leaves one first-soft-Rees logarithmic class at the total-energy/site-soft boundary of a representative physical threshold. Does cyclic assembly leave an additional supported class?
Labelled specialization
Entry 1794 identifies the generic logarithmic lines as one free regular -orbit:
Entry 1797 produces one nonzero first-Rees line at the corresponding labelled soft corner. Cyclic transport produces five such lines:
The source orientation, residue order, and radial leading coefficient are transported simultaneously. Consequently the specialization has the form
The common unit is irrelevant to kernel and cokernel and is not fitted occurrence by occurrence.
Exact cone
The specialization commutes with the cyclic generator and has rank five:
Therefore
Result
The first-soft-Rees orbit is exactly the boundary specialization of the generic logarithmic orbit. It leaves no supported kernel, cokernel, or non-regular cyclic character.
This closes the total-energy/site-soft boundary of the physical five-site threshold within the tested source family:
No new carrier or coherence generator is required.
Next falsifier
Move from total-energy support to the independent one-wall closure intersections of . Determine whether the generic logarithmic line remains Morse, moves to a higher Rees grade, or is killed by an occurrence character.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_soft_rees_orbit_cone.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-soft-rees-orbit-cone.json
- Entries 1794 and 1797
- allocator claim: seqclaim-dd6460e4765366bc454c51af