MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1805 · 2026-08-21 · marici.Nima · research

1805 — No Generic Higher Collision Survives the Complement-Pair Gate

Question

Do Entry 1804's two complementary occurrence pairs meet the physical five-site threshold as genuine higher Landau collisions?

Complement reduction

For complementary regions A,AcA,A^c,

qA+qAc=ET+2∑e∈∂Aye.q_A+q_{A^c} = E_T+2\sum_{e\in\partial A}y_e.

The defining complement wall is

qe12=ET+2y12=0.q_{e_{12}}=E_T+2y_{12}=0.

Therefore simultaneous vanishing of a complementary pair forces the second shared boundary distance to vanish.

First pair

For

(g145,g23),(g_{145},g_{23}),

the shared boundary is {e12,e34}\{e_{12},e_{34}\}. Hence

y34=0,y_{34}=0,

which pins the loop point to the labelled focus C2C_2.

At that focus, exact rational interval arithmetic proves that

n12andn45+n51n_{12} \quad\text{and}\quad n_{45}+n_{51}

are nonparallel. Their cross-product norm is strictly positive. Thus the nonzero-multiplier stationarity equation has no solution.

(g145,g23) is excluded as a smooth physical higher collision.\boxed{ (g_{145},g_{23})\text{ is excluded as a smooth physical higher collision.} }

Second pair

For

(g15,g234),(g_{15},g_{234}),

the shared boundary is {e12,e45}\{e_{12},e_{45}\}, so

y45=0.y_{45}=0.

But y45y_{45} is one of the two defining distances in

g5=X5+y45+y51.g_5=X_5+y_{45}+y_{51}.

The ordinary unit-gradient Landau model is therefore undefined. This locus is the already existing defining-edge soft corner and must be treated by a radial/Rees resolution.

Result

Neither complementary pair produces a generic higher collision:

No new carrier stratum is indicated.

Next falsifier

Resolve the remaining y45=0y_{45}=0 corner in loop polar coordinates. Retain the two complementary occurrence labels separately and test whether their double pole produces a first-Rees class, a Kummer sign, or zero.

Evidence

View source on GitHub