1807 — The Complementary Pole-Log Is Occurrence-Even
Question
Does Entry 1806's doubled-occurrence logarithm contain a relative-sign component that survives the physical occurrence trace?
Frozen object
Retain the two complementary labels
before imposing their common physical section at . Because the source integrand contains their product, the scalar occurrence space is
The class derived in Entry 1806 is the mixed class
Complement involution
The label-complement involution exchanges . In the ordered symmetric basis its matrix is
Therefore
The physical diagonal trace sends all three symmetric monomials to the same section and maps nontrivially. The antisymmetric wedge is not a scalar coefficient class of the frozen product. Consequently
This statement concerns the scalar occurrence coefficient. It does not erase orientation signs belonging to an independently typed iterated residue map.
Cyclic assembly
The complementary pair has a free orbit under . Hence its five pole-twisted logarithms assemble as one regular representation,
Each occurrence carries the rank-one nilpotent from Entry 1806. Thus the assembled nilpotent satisfies
Narrow result
The only activated complementary soft family is occurrence-even and survives physical diagonal identification. Its complexity is a regular -orbit of pole-twisted rank-one logarithmic extensions. No anti-diagonal scalar coefficient and no new carrier structure are generated.
Next falsifier
Analyze intersections among the 34 transverse supported region-wall pairs. Determine whether their normal-crossing coefficient objects are exhausted by tensor products of the already derived rank-one Kummer lines, or whether an independently source-derived extension couples two transverse wall factors.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_complement_soft_occurrence_trace.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-complement-soft-occurrence-trace.json
- allocator claim: seqclaim-6427456ae8d03e2b70846277