1811 — Two Transverse Wall Residues Produce a Rational Quadratic Quotient
Question
Do Entry 1810's active transverse pairs carry the tensor product of their two one-wall Kummer coefficient lines?
Local model
Normalize the threshold Morse germ to
For two transverse wall normals, write
and
Entry 1804 certifies for every pair considered here, and Entry 1809 certifies its source coefficient as nonzero.
Double residue
The two wall equations fix both Morse variables:
Consequently, up to the ordered residue orientation,
The quadratic numerator before division by is
Result
The coefficient object is a rank-one meromorphic quadratic-pole quotient:
It is not the tensor product of two one-wall Kummer lines. The reason is geometric: each one-wall residue leaves one Morse integration variable and therefore a square root, while two independent wall residues fix both Morse variables and leave no integration variable from which a second square root could arise.
All 22 local active types have this form. Their labelled cyclic assembly has rank 110 and character
The quadratic pole is coefficient support compiled from the existing threshold and wall normals. It is not a new carrier generator.
Architectural consequence
Coefficient formation is not multiplicative under transverse carrier intersection:
The correct object is obtained by applying the iterated residue functor to the shared Morse coefficient germ, not by tensoring already-integrated one-wall answers.
Next falsifier
Study the quadratic pole divisor
at its intersections with total-energy and defining-edge soft support. Test whether its specialization is generated by the existing nearby-cycle and soft Rees maps or leaves a supported excess.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_transverse_pair_rational_quotients.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-transverse-pair-rational-quotients.json
- Entries 1804, 1809, and 1810
- allocator claim: seqclaim-be4afbc548d4d47d410ee3c1