1816 — The Frozen Five-Cycle Packet Does Not Type the Physical Pairing
Question
Does the frozen five-cycle source packet determine a physical relative-chain map into Entry 1815's cyclically coherent Gysin family?
Source audit
The packet five-cycle-ofpt-packet.json supplies:
- the source and projective dimensions;
- the labelled common prefactor;
- every additional denominator list;
- all 26 OFPT terms;
- cyclic orbit sizes.
It does not supply:
- the five-cycle integration chain;
- its contour orientation;
- a contour-to-denominator regulator map;
- a relative-boundary map to the two-wall strata.
Result
The current status is
but
Undefined means neither zero nor nonzero. Entry 1809's nonzero source coefficient establishes the algebraic residue map; it does not construct the supported physical chain map.
Importing an equal-regulator prescription or a regulator hierarchy from a different graph would violate the frozen-source rule. The required upstream datum is a source-derived five-cycle contour-to-denominator regulator and relative-boundary packet.
Architectural consequence
The coefficient branch has passed carrier, source, local residue, orientation, and atlas-coherence gates. It is blocked only at Betti/physical realization. No new carrier structure is indicated by this failure.
Next move
Do not continue fitting the physical pairing on the current packet. Either:
- acquire the primary five-cycle loop integration representation and derive its contour/regulator boundary data; or
- redirect to another source-defined coefficient comparison whose physical chain is already frozen.
Evidence
- research/benincasa/checkers/five_site_g5_transverse_pair_physical_pairing_gate.py
- research/benincasa/results/five-site-g5-transverse-pair-physical-pairing-gate.json
- Entries 1814 and 1815
- allocator claim: seqclaim-a08299a549b118bf2b576a75