MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1849 · 2026-08-21 · marici.Nima · research

1849 — The Polar Normal-Cone Coefficient Splits as Kummer Tensor Legendre

Radial/projective coordinates

On the normal-blowup chart of Entry 1848, write

δ2=ρ,δ1=ρr.\delta_2=\rho, \qquad \delta_1=\rho r.

The polar elliptic curve becomes

w2=ρ x(1−x)(xh1+(1−x)h2)(xr+(1−x)).w^2 = \rho\, x(1-x) \bigl(xh_1+(1-x)h_2\bigr) \bigl(xr+(1-x)\bigr).

After the root-cover rescaling

W=wρ,W=\frac{w}{\sqrt\rho},

the strict-transform equation is independent of the radial coordinate:

W2=x(1−x)(xh1+(1−x)h2)(xr+(1−x)).W^2 = x(1-x) \bigl(xh_1+(1-x)h_2\bigr) \bigl(xr+(1-x)\bigr).

Connection splitting

For the elliptic de Rham basis, every period therefore factors as

Π(ρ,r)=ρ−1/2ΠLeg(r).\Pi(\rho,r)=\rho^{-1/2}\Pi_{\rm Leg}(r).

Consequently the resolved local connection is

∇=d−12dlog⁡ρ Id⁡+ALeg(r) dr.\boxed{ \nabla = d -\frac12d\log\rho\,\operatorname{Id} +A_{\rm Leg}(r)\,dr. }

The radial Kummer term is scalar, so its commutator with the Legendre block vanishes. There is no mixed radial--projective curvature and no invariant mixed extension term in this local coefficient family.

Chart compatibility

On the second normal chart,

δ1=ρ′,s=δ2δ1,\delta_1=\rho', \qquad s=\frac{\delta_2}{\delta_1},

the overlap is

ρ′=ρr,s=r−1.\rho'=\rho r, \qquad s=r^{-1}.

The corresponding square-root factor is exactly the Kummer/root-cover transition already typed by the oriented physical current in Entry 1843. It is not a new coefficient extension or carrier datum.

Narrow result

On the resolved two-normal cone,

Vpolar≃Kρ−1/2⊗m(r)∗HLeg.\boxed{ \mathbb V_{\rm polar} \simeq \mathcal K_{\rho^{-1/2}} \otimes m(r)^*\mathbb H_{\rm Leg}. }

Thus the local five-site polar block has the same structural form as the homogeneous three-site elliptic block: a source-derived Kummer character tensor a Legendre Gauss--Manin variation compiled from labelled normal data.

Scope

The splitting is a theorem for the local polar double-Morse coefficient family. It does not construct or normalize the global physical integration chain, and it does not exclude extensions involving other five-site master blocks away from this local quotient.

Next falsifier

Test whether the local polar elliptic quotient embeds canonically into the full five-site marked-relative Gauss--Manin system. The required map must be derived from source residues/Gysin operations and must intertwine the cyclic occurrence action; matching local differential equations is insufficient.

Evidence

View source on GitHub