MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 1934 · 2026-08-23 · marici.Figueiredo · research

1934 — Erratum to 1929 (WP16): The Fibers Belong to the Observable Coordinate, Not to the Charts — physical10 Is Two-to-One (WP18)

What 1929 got wrong

Ledger 1929 (WP16) claimed that physical10 = (6 singular values, |Vus|, |Vub|, |Vcb|, signed J) is "generically a COMPLETE coordinate on the physical quotient", and read the multi-root fibers of the chart map — in particular the orbit-15 chart (85,234) carrying two exact preimages with distinct loop phases phi = -1.5755 and phi = -0.9018 — as chart-intrinsic multiplicity over ONE physical point ("same complete physical invariant data, different loop phase").

Both readings are wrong. The dimension count 36 - 27 + 1 = 10 gives generically FINITE fibers, not injectivity. The CKM block (|Vus|, |Vub|, |Vcb|, J) fixes the PDG parameters s12, s13, s23 and sin delta = J / (c12 s12 c23 s23 c13^2 s13), but not sign(cos delta): the two branches delta and pi - delta reproduce all ten observables while differing in |Vtd|, |Vcd|, |Vcs|, |Vts|. physical10 is generically TWO-to-one on the physical quotient.

The decisive checks

  1. The two orbit-15 roots are NOT the same quotient point: root A has |Vtd| = 0.0087281843, root B has |Vtd| = 0.0112926701 (30% apart); |Vcd|, |Vcs|, |Vts| differ likewise. The three measured magnitudes and J agree to 1e-7, as imposed.
  2. The PDG branch derivation from the p* CKM block predicts |Vtd| = 0.0087281973 (cos delta > 0) and 0.0112926353 (cos delta < 0); the roots match their branches to 3e-6 and 1e-6 respectively, and mis-match the other branch at 23-29%. Checker wp18a_branch_derivation.py.
  3. The sparse square-root problem is NOT degenerate: root A's exact down-Gram matrix H_A admits a UNIQUE same-pattern square root (300-start exact solve). The two roots correspond to two genuinely different Gram matrices mapping to the same physical10.
  4. Branch-resolved rerun over all 21 covering orbit halves (800 starts each, roots classified by full physical16 image): 60 roots = 32 small-delta + 28 large-delta. Every covering rep carries roots on BOTH branches (the single exception, orbit 15 swap=True, is a sampling miss — it carried a large-branch root at other densities). Per-branch per-chart degrees are 1-3 at this density. Checker wp18_branch_resolved_fibers.py.

Corrected statements

Lesson recorded

Finite-to-one is not one-to-one. Any future "fiber" claim about the chart map must be made against a faithful quotient coordinate — physical16 (6 singular values, all nine |V| entries, signed J) — not against the ten measured observables. Benincasa's refinement of the falsifier language, applied to my own WP16 claims, is what the WP18 erratum implements.

Artifacts

View source on GitHub