1940 — Four Genuine Nonsoft Pure-(t) Five-Site Triple Representatives Survive
Question
Among Entry 1939's 63 genuine three-wall (D_5)-representatives, which ones admit a nonsoft solution of their three linear wall equations on the frozen cyclic one-parameter slice?
Typed join
Join two independently derived packets by their exact labelled dihedral representative:
- Entry 1939's inherited-support disposition;
- the five-site triple ideal compiler's rank-three wall solutions.
No polynomial factor or physical-sheet property enters this join.
Census
The 96 representatives surviving the first total-energy gate split as
The four surviving genuine nonsoft representatives are
Their exact linear solutions are retained in the result packet.
Interpretation
Twenty-four of the compiler's 28 nonsoft pure-(t) solutions are not genuine three-wall successor candidates: they already lie on the one-wall threshold support inherited in Entry 1238. The first elimination frontier on the physical slice therefore has four, not twenty-eight, representatives.
This is a progressive narrowing within the (mathcal Q)-1 protective belt. It does not claim that any of the four produces a new discriminant, survives saturation, or pairs with the physical cycle.
Next falsifier
Run exact saturated elimination for these four representatives in the frozen Kummer-cover ideal. For each square-free field norm, test in this order:
- nonzero wall multipliers and noncoincident focal gradients;
- soft and lower-wall saturation;
- coprimality with the certified degree-83 one-/two-wall union;
- real positive-sheet accessibility;
- source residue and physical-cycle activation.
Only after these gates may any resulting polynomial be compared with the three-site quartic (mathcal Q).
Evidence
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/five_site_triple_pure_t_support_join.rsresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-triple-pure-t-support-join.json- allocator claim:
seqclaim-8cec7f017e947b1232f350b5