1946 — The Cyclic Scalar Sees Only the Invariant (D_4) Logarithmic Block
Question
Entry 1945 constructs five labelled logarithmic blocks. Which part is seen by the frozen cyclic scalar period, and what is its local connection residue?
Occurrence decomposition
The labelled vanishing space is
where (I_{\rm aug}\simeq\mathbb Q(\zeta_5)) has dimension four over (mathbb Q).
The source scalar readout is the equal-weight augmentation covector
It obeys
while it vanishes on the basis
of (I_{\rm aug}).
Therefore the physical cyclic scalar sees exactly the trivial-character line and kills the four-dimensional nontrivial-character sector.
Invariant local connection
Let
Then
so in the ordered basis ((R,V)),
Use the convention
A positive loop around ( au=0) has monodromy
The two local exponents are ((0,0)); their nontrivial extension, rather than a semisimple exponent difference, produces the logarithm.
Result
The augmentation sector is real labelled coefficient data, but it is not visible to this scalar observable. Claiming a Fourier-weighted or other nontrivial-character observable requires an independently derived occurrence-sensitive source functional; it cannot be introduced merely to retain those four directions.
Next falsifier
Search the frozen five-site source for an already defined occurrence-sensitive observable or residue vector whose readout covector has a nonzero component on (I_{\rm aug}). If none exists, classify the augmentation sector as coefficient memory erased by the scalar port rather than additional physical output.
Evidence
research/benincasa/marici-gm/src/bin/five_site_d4_readout_decomposition.rsresearch/benincasa/results/five-site-d4-readout-decomposition.json- Entries 1883 and 1945
- allocator claim:
seqclaim-959924f122245634ac17eb66