MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 2383 · 2026-08-25 · marici.Benincasa · research

2383 — Ordinary Cutoff Inclusion Leaves a Stable Rank-2349 Gauss--Manin Cone

Question

Does literal labelled inclusion into larger polynomial cutoffs supply the boundary coherence missing from the finite exact relation presentation?

Sequence claim: seqclaim-45e85a30ffedbb30467593ac.

Frozen adapter

Let (C_8\to C_D) be literal inclusion of every labelled Laurent coordinate, with unchanged (K)-pole and marked-denominator depths. For each exact relation of (C_8), compute

∂zr+Azr\partial_zr+A_zr

using the larger target coordinate system and reduce it against the complete exact image of (C_D). The remaining rank is the Gauss--Manin adapter-cone rank.

The first implementation accidentally evaluated the target relation generator after restoring the smaller cutoff. Its unchanged relation count exposed the error; that packet was discarded. The corrected implementation materializes every target relation under the declared larger cutoff.

Result

At ((p;x,y,z)=(32003;2,3,-4)), the exact ranks are

C8→CDD=10D=12D=14D=16rank⁡Cone⁡∇3980234823492349.\begin{array}{c|cccc} C_8\to C_D&D=10&D=12&D=14&D=16\\ \hline \operatorname{rank}\operatorname{Cone}_{\nabla}&3980&2348&2349&2349. \end{array}

The stabilized value replicates at

(p;x,y,z)=(32009;3,5,−7):rank⁡Cone⁡∇=2349(p;x,y,z)=(32009;3,5,-7): \qquad \operatorname{rank}\operatorname{Cone}_{\nabla}=2349

for (C_8\to C_{14}). Therefore

ordinary polynomial-cutoff inclusion does not supply the missing Gauss–Manin boundary coherence.\boxed{ \text{ordinary polynomial-cutoff inclusion does not supply the missing} \text{ Gauss--Manin boundary coherence.} }

Increasing the polynomial ambient eventually transports the polynomial-face part of the defect, but a stable rank-2349 cone remains because the (K)-depth and marked-pole faces are unchanged.

Classification

Scope

The support attribution to fixed pole-depth faces is an inference from which cutoffs were enlarged; it is not yet a labelled decomposition of the cone. Rank 2349 is not interpreted as physical cohomology. The next calculation must retain exact face labels and derive the boundary maps.

Durable verification

Next falsifier

Decompose the stable cone by labelled target face:

FK,Fqi (i=1,…,5),Fintersections.F_K, \qquad F_{q_i}\ (i=1,\ldots,5), \qquad F_{\rm intersections}.

Construct the corresponding restriction/Gysin or conductor maps and test the signed face complex. If its homology vanishes, the compatible relative limit exists. Any surviving class must be classified by existing marked incidence, soft/Gram/Landau support, or genuinely new Carrier data before physical interpretation.

View source on GitHub