MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 2442 · 2026-08-25 · marici.Benincasa · research

2442 — The Existing Cayley--Menger Sheet Compiles All Three Tensor Helicity Vertices

Question

Entries 2440--2441 derive a faithful local helicity pair and its scalar time seed. Does inserting that pair into the three-site loop require new angular Carrier coordinates, or can it be reconstructed from the frozen labelled distance geometry?

Labelled tetrahedral geometry

Use

(c,a,b)=(y12,y23,y31).(c,a,b)=(y_{12},y_{23},y_{31}).

The three base edges are labelled by the external momentum magnitudes:

P1:y12↔y31,P2:y23↔y12,P3:y31↔y23.P_1:y_{12}\leftrightarrow y_{31}, \qquad P_2:y_{23}\leftrightarrow y_{12}, \qquad P_3:y_{31}\leftrightarrow y_{23}.

This is exactly the source Cayley--Menger tetrahedron: the loop momentum is the apex and the external momentum triangle is its base.

For site 1, place the P1P_1 edge on the xx axis and the external triangle in the (x,y)(x,y) plane. Write the apex as (x,Y,Z)(x,Y,Z). Trilateration gives

x=c2+P12−b22P1,x=\frac{c^2+P_1^2-b^2}{2P_1},

and determines Y2Y^2 rationally from (a,b,c;P1,P2,P3)(a,b,c;P_1,P_2,P_3). The remaining normal coordinate satisfies

Z2=KCMΛ(P1,P2,P3).\boxed{ Z^2=\frac{K_{\rm CM}} {\Lambda(P_1,P_2,P_3)}. }

Here the source normalization is DCM=−2KCMD_{\rm CM}=-2K_{\rm CM} and

Λ=(P1−P2−P3)(P1−P2+P3)(P1+P2−P3)(P1+P2+P3).\Lambda =(P_1-P_2-P_3)(P_1-P_2+P_3) (P_1+P_2-P_3)(P_1+P_2+P_3).

The identity follows exactly from

det⁡G(P1,P2,ℓ)=−14KCM.\det G_{(P_1,P_2,\ell)}=-\frac14K_{\rm CM}.

The other two sites follow by the labelled cyclic action.

Helicity compilation

At site ii, the transverse part of the source momentum difference is twice the apex displacement (Yi,Zi)(Y_i,Z_i). After Entry 2441's time-weight cancellation, the two tensor coefficients are therefore

Hi+=(Yi+iZi)2,Hi−=(Yi−iZi)2.\boxed{ H_i^+=(Y_i+iZ_i)^2, \qquad H_i^-=(Y_i-iZ_i)^2. }

The deck involution Zi↦−ZiZ_i\mapsto-Z_i exchanges the two labelled helicities. Thus the tensor numerator uses:

It introduces no additional angular incidence coordinate.

Faithfulness and rank loss

For each site, the real quadrupole coordinates

(Yi2−Zi2,  2YiZi)(Y_i^2-Z_i^2,\;2Y_iZ_i)

map to (Hi+,Hi−)(H_i^+,H_i^-) with determinant −2i-2i. Across all three sites the block transfer has rank six and determinant

(−2i)3=8i.(-2i)^3=8i.

The local quadrupole Jacobian is

4(Yi2+Zi2)=−Lambda(Pi,yi−1,i,yi,i+1)Pi2.4(Y_i^2+Z_i^2) =-\frac{Lambda(P_i,y_{i-1,i},y_{i,i+1})}{P_i^2}.

Hence rank is lost only when the corresponding apex/base face is collinear. These are existing triangular face Gram divisors. Soft factors Pi=0P_i=0 are also already frozen support.

Result

All three occurrence-labelled finite-qq tensor vertices are compiled from the existing Gram and Cayley–Menger coefficient sheets.

This is evidence for H2's shared Carrier plus sector-specific coefficient objects: spin two uses the scalar carrier's orientation cover without adding a tensor-specific cell.

Scope

This is an exact geometric compilation of the local numerator. It does not yet prove that multiplication by these six coefficients is closed on the rank-sixty twisted cohomology, nor that the Ward-correlated channel/contact sum is flat. It also does not identify which tensor ports are accessible to the physical relative cycle after integration.

Durable evidence

Next falsifier

Reduce multiplication by the six labelled helicity coefficients in the generic rank-sixty marked-relative quotient. Verify cyclic covariance and localization compatibility before summing helicities or occurrences. A failure to close must be classified as a coefficient-module enlargement or as genuinely new Carrier support.

View source on GitHub