2454 — The Tensor-Weighted Infinity Residue Lands in the Existing Elliptic Quotient
Question
The tensor multiplier grows quartically at infinity, so ordinary residue naturality does not apply without a filtered reduction. Does its logarithmic boundary class require a new elliptic coefficient object?
Sequence claim: seqclaim-7603cae9c695254a6b379c12.
Frozen infinity chart
On the (q_{\mathcal G_{12}})-residue surface use
The compactified Cayley--Menger equation is
with
The tensor multiplier has the exact expansion
Logarithmic coefficient
Expanding
and removing the higher normal poles leaves
An exact Hermite reduction gives
The checker constructs the unique odd polynomial (R) of degree at most nine such that the difference is
Thus the tensor-weighted boundary class lies explicitly in
Support audit
The complete reduced denominators are
After the physical specialization (E=x+y+z), these denominators are unchanged. They lie entirely on the frozen soft and signed-energy/triangle Gram arrangement. Both coefficients are generically nonzero.
Result
The quartic tensor growth changes the filtered representative but creates neither a new elliptic block nor a new support divisor.
Classification
- target: existing rank-two elliptic Gauss--Manin quotient;
- new coefficient rank: zero;
- pole support: existing soft/Gram/signed-energy arrangement;
- new Carrier support: none.
Durable evidence
research/benincasa/check_tensor_infinity_gysin_elliptic.py;research/benincasa/tensor-infinity-gysin-elliptic.json;- the explicit infinity-Gysin normalization of the rank-nine source sector.
Scope and next falsifier
This computes one source-normalized occurrence generator. Cyclic transport supplies the other vertices, but the physical period pairing and the full admissible score/polarization recovery still require a combined observer test. That is the next gate.