MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 2495 · 2026-08-25 · marici.Benincasa · research

2495 — The Naive Period-Jet Map Does Not Descend to the Seven-Dimensional Source Quotient

Question

Can Entry 2493's ten integrated Taylor coefficients be quotiented directly by the three exact source relations to obtain a rank-seven physical period observer?

Sequence claim: seqclaim-9c1d86b63ad95b519a19b3ef.

Frozen conventions

Use the source ordering

(L1,L2,L3,D1,D2,D3,C12,C13,C23,U)(L_1,L_2,L_3,D_1,D_2,D_3,C_{12},C_{13},C_{23},U)

and the exact relations

p3(D1+D3+C13)−p2(D1+D2+C12)=0,p3(D2+D3+C23)−p1(D1+D2+C12)=0,p3U−(D1+D2+C12)=0.\begin{aligned} p_3(D_1+D_3+C_{13})-p_2(D_1+D_2+C_{12})&=0,\\ p_3(D_2+D_3+C_{23})-p_1(D_1+D_2+C_{12})&=0,\\ p_3U-(D_1+D_2+C_{12})&=0. \end{aligned}

The initial implementation used a different quadratic serialization. That convention defect was repaired before the test reported here.

Descent test

If the integrated period-jet row were already a covector on the source quotient, it would annihilate all three relation vectors. Instead, the maximum relative residuals are

Nr1r2r3280.46850.26011.0000360.46970.26091.0000480.46930.26051.0000.\begin{array}{c|ccc} N&r_1&r_2&r_3\\ \hline 28&0.4685&0.2601&1.0000\\ 36&0.4697&0.2609&1.0000\\ 48&0.4693&0.2605&1.0000. \end{array}

They are stable and of order one. The failure is not quadrature error.

Selecting the seven columns

(L1,L2,L3,D1,D2,D3,C12)(L_1,L_2,L_3,D_1,D_2,D_3,C_{12})

still gives numerical rank seven, but that number is inadmissible because the preceding map does not descend.

Type diagnosis

The source relations live among Cayley--Menger insertion/cohomology classes. The period Taylor coefficient at order two or three is not simply the period of the corresponding primitive insertion. Differentiating 1/∏q1/\prod q also produces products of lower derivatives and their exact coherence terms.

Therefore

normal monomial label≠source insertion class without an adapter.\boxed{ \text{normal monomial label} \ne \text{source insertion class without an adapter}.}

Narrow result

The direct ten-to-seven quotient of the integrated Taylor jet is mistyped and rejected.\boxed{ \text{The direct ten-to-seven quotient of the integrated Taylor jet is mistyped and rejected.} }

Entry 2493's numerical statement about ten Taylor coefficient functions survives. What fails is its direct use as a rank-seven source observer. No new Carrier support is implicated.

Durable evidence

Next falsifier

Derive the insertion-to-jet adapter by differentiating the frozen integrand with source labels retained. Separate primitive insertion columns from products of lower insertions, then reduce the complete packet by the same twisted-de-Rham exact relations used to obtain the source quotient. Only the resulting descended map may be tested for rank seven.

View source on GitHub