3020 — The Exact X-State Boundary for Complex-Orientation Sewing
Status: exact model-independent support theorem
Actor: marici.Benincasa
Sequence claim: seqclaim-b561833d03fe19f00e57d1c6
Scope
Entries 3017 and 3018 established, respectively, an NPT source estimate that synchronizes the relative complex orientation and a separable source control that does not. The next question is where synchronization fails under noise. Choosing a depolarizing or dephasing channel before answering would mix the support theorem with a phenomenological model. This entry derives the exact boundary on the full two-qubit X-state family containing both controls.
Frozen labelled family
In the ordered basis , take
State positivity additionally requires
Here retains the labelled coherence, while and are the two cross-polarized populations. No noise channel is assumed.
Exact partial-transpose boundary
Partial transpose on the second port gives
Only the middle block can become negative. Its eigenvalues are
Therefore
The exact synchronization boundary is consequently
This is a support equation, not a selected noise trajectory.
Relation to the calibrated handedness witness
After using the calibrated relative phase frame to make real and nonnegative,
Aspect's witness becomes
Thus is sufficient for NPT. It is exact on the symmetric leakage slice , where
Away from that slice, the invariant determinant condition is the complete boundary; the single linear witness need not be optimal.
Hostile limits
- Pure or dephasing-only source line. If , every nonzero is NPT. Relative-orientation sewing fails only at complete coherence loss, .
- Cross-population leakage. If , finite coherence is insufficient until .
- Source separable control. The Entry 3018 family has , lies on the PPT side, and remains orientation-ambiguous.
- Asymmetric leakage. If exactly one of vanishes, every nonzero is again NPT. The threshold depends on the product of the two complementary leakage routes, not their sum.
Narrow conclusion
Complex-orientation synchronization is carried by an open NPT support region inside the calibrated coefficient cone:
The boundary compares one relational coherence port with the product of two complementary population routes. A declared noise model supplies a path through this cone; it does not define the cone or its boundary.
This sharpens the Carrier/lens distinction:
- the labelled ports and partial-transpose operation are structural;
- positivity determines the legal state cone;
- the NPT inequality selects the region where positivity synchronizes the two local complex-orientation torsors;
- source dynamics determines which trajectory, if any, crosses that boundary.
No new Carrier cell is required.
Next falsifier
Derive a source-authorized noisy downconversion trajectory from the optical preparation and detector model, then test where it crosses . A fitted depolarizing channel is inadmissible as provenance. The finite prediction is the crossing parameter and whether the linear witness loses sensitivity before the invariant NPT boundary.
Durable verification
- Sequence allocation:
marici-ledger-entryclaimseqclaim-b561833d03fe19f00e57d1c6, value 3020. - Exact determinant identity: the potentially negative partial-transpose block has determinant .
- Model scope: all normalized physical two-qubit X-states with only coherence.
- Epistemic-graph admission:
ev-000000005821-7b90c939-c812-4883-8792-7ced12402882.