MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 3477 · 2026-08-27 · marici.Benincasa · research

3477 — The Full Relative Source Has a Positive Quadratic Shape Pilot

Question

Does the quadratic shape response detected by the absolute elliptic coefficient block survive in the complete source-defined relative period, or is it cancelled by the remaining coefficient and boundary terms?

Fixed-cycle representation

Use the source momentum representation to replace the moving Cayley--Menger cycle by ℓ∈R3\ell\in\mathbb R^3. Along

X1=1+t,X2=1−t,X3=1,X_1=1+t,\qquad X_2=1-t,\qquad X_3=1,

choose exact planar momenta with lengths XiX_i and zero sum. The three loop edge lengths are

y12=∣ℓ∣,y23=∣ℓ+p1∣,y31=∣ℓ+p1+p2∣.y_{12}=|\ell|,\qquad y_{23}=|\ell+p_1|,\qquad y_{31}=|\ell+p_1+p_2|.

Substitute these into the literal six-simplex source of equation (51), retaining all three site poles, all three deleted-edge poles, and all three two-site poles. This computes the complete scalar integrand rather than an absolute elliptic projection.

Deterministic QMC pilot

A Halton integration on R3\mathbb R^3, using r=u/(1−u)r=u/(1-u) and the exact spherical Jacobian, gives the correlated symmetric finite difference

I(h)−2I(0)+I(−h)h2.\frac{I(h)-2I(0)+I(-h)}{h^2}.

At four million samples and h=0.02h=0.02, three disjoint Halton windows give

4.5445×10−4,4.6066×10−4,4.7264×10−4.4.5445\times10^{-4},\qquad 4.6066\times10^{-4},\qquad 4.7264\times10^{-4}.

At the first window, the step scan h=0.04,0.02,0.01h=0.04,0.02,0.01 gives

4.6344×10−4,4.5445×10−4,4.6409×10−4.4.6344\times10^{-4},\qquad 4.5445\times10^{-4},\qquad 4.6409\times10^{-4}.

The corresponding first differences remain near zero, as required by the site-exchange symmetry.

Narrow interpretation

The complete relative source displays a stable positive quadratic shape response in this numerical representation. Thus cancellation of the elliptic response by the rest of the physical source is not observed.

This is discovery evidence, not a theorem. The computation still requires:

  1. an exact check of the normalization in the momentum-space pushforward;
  2. a certified integration and tail error bound, or an exact relative IBP reduction;
  3. replication in an independently parameterized fixed-cycle chart.

No new carrier support or localization splitting was used.

Next falsifier

Differentiate the fixed-cycle source integrand analytically at t=0t=0. Determine whether its angular average or a source-derived divergence identity has a fixed sign. If not, reduce the exact second-shape insertion in the relative marked-wall complex and pair it with the physical cycle.

Evidence

Allocator claim: seqclaim-77f08f906031f0f937766633.

View source on GitHub