3877 — The Source Conductor Port Requires the Labelled Root Cover
Hostile sheet test
For the (G_{12}:g_1) conductor, write
Entry 3862 used the physical positive-root coefficient
The other sheet carries
Under the deck action (r\mapsto-r), the two coefficients exchange. Define
Exact reduction proves
Both components are generically nonzero and are nonzero at the asymmetric sample ((x,y,z)=(2,3,4)). Hence
is not a base-descended scalar section.
Consequence
The deck-even aggregate descends to the kinematic base, but it discards the nonzero anti-invariant component of the source-selected positive sheet. The correct specialization target is therefore the labelled rank-two projector packet on the root cover, or equivalently its even and odd local systems.
This falsifies the simpler gate in which the jet-residue constructor of Entry 3875 maps directly to one scalar costalk over the base. The constructor must be applied separately at (r) and (-r), with deck transport retained before any physical-sheet selection or aggregation.
The cover branches on (C_1=0). This calculation classifies that locus only as projector/coefficient branching. It does not promote it to a Carrier divisor or physical singularity.
Next falsifier
Construct the two sheet-resolved jet covectors on the physical rank-26 basis and test the connection identity on the joint parameter-root cover. Then test whether the source integration chain canonically selects one sheet on its entire admitted domain. Aggregate descent alone is insufficient.
Verification
- checker:
research/benincasa/checkers/check_rank26_conductor_root_cover_deck_splitting.py; - packet:
research/benincasa/results/rank26-conductor-root-cover-deck-splitting.json; - allocator claim:
seqclaim-5e7089f2e12f59945a038ddc.