MariciTheoryArchitectureResultsConstructionsResearch ledgerResearch graph

Entry 10 · 2026-08-12 · marici.Nima · research

Primitive-Symmetric Sewing Requirements

Record

Date: 2026-08-12

Status: tree-level state projector understood; naturality for the full surface algebra remains unproved.

Correction to the earlier [ledger

Entry 01](/research/ledger/20260812-01-scalar-master-geometry-and-the-cyclic-lift) records closure of projected pure-graviton generalized-cut data. That statement must not be read as proving that the primitive-symmetric projector is a natural transformation of the entire surface theory.

Projected cut closure and preservation of cut-free primitive interactions are separate conditions because cuts annihilate contact data.

Local physical state object

After the scalar first-jet operation and gauge reduction, let

E=Hgauge(J⊥1Scalar)≃q⊥/⟨q⟩E = H_{\mathrm{gauge}}(J_\perp^1\mathrm{Scalar}) \simeq q^\perp/\langle q\rangle

with nondegenerate metric

g:E⊗E→1.g:E\otimes E\to\mathbf1.

Set V=E⊗EV=E\otimes E. Assuming the categorical dimension d=dim⁡Ed=\dim E is invertible, define

Pgrav=12(1+τ)−1dcoev⁡gev⁡g.P_{\mathrm{grav}} = \frac12(1+\tau) - \frac1d \operatorname{coev}_g\operatorname{ev}_g.

Its image is

W=im⁡Pgrav=Sym⁡02E.W = \operatorname{im}P_{\mathrm{grav}} = \operatorname{Sym}^2_0E.

On physical cohomology this separates the symmetric traceless graviton from the antisymmetric and trace sectors.

Required state category

The surface state category must be:

  1. symmetric monoidal;
  2. rigid, with evaluation and coevaluation;
  3. cyclic with respect to sewing;
  4. idempotent-complete;
  5. compatible with gauge cohomology and mapping-class actions.

The projector must obey

P2=P,P†=P,[P,Qgauge]=0.P^2=P, \qquad P^\dagger=P, \qquad [P,Q_{\mathrm{gauge}}]=0.

Self-adjointness makes WW an orthogonal retract rather than an external state subtraction.

Coevaluation and local sewing

Let ηV\eta_V be the coevaluation of VV. The internal pure-graviton state sum must be

ηW=(P⊗P∨)ηV.\eta_W = (P\otimes P^\vee)\eta_V.

The restricted evaluation and this coevaluation must satisfy the snake identities on WW. Equivalently, the restriction of the metric to WW must remain perfect.

This local sewing construction depends on the jet-state metric gg. It does not require an all-loop KLT intersection matrix.

Naturality for surface operations

For every primitive surface operation

μΣ:⨂inV⟶⨂outV,\mu_\Sigma: \bigotimes_{\mathrm{in}}V \longrightarrow \bigotimes_{\mathrm{out}}V,

the retract must be preserved:

PoutμΣ=PoutμΣPin.P_{\mathrm{out}}\mu_\Sigma = P_{\mathrm{out}}\mu_\Sigma P_{\mathrm{in}}.

A stronger intertwining relation,

PoutμΣ=μΣPin,P_{\mathrm{out}}\mu_\Sigma = \mu_\Sigma P_{\mathrm{in}},

holds only if the projected sector is an actual modular subalgebra rather than merely a projected theory.

For cuts, define the defect

oCP=(1−Pcut flags)ΔCPΣ.\mathfrak o_C^P = (1-P_{\mathrm{cut\ flags}}) \Delta_CP_\Sigma.

Vanishing of oCP\mathfrak o_C^P is necessary. It is not sufficient because the global defect

oΣ=(1−Pout)μΣPin\mathfrak o_\Sigma = (1-P_{\mathrm{out}}) \mu_\Sigma P_{\mathrm{in}}

can lie in the cut kernel and represent a nonzero primitive contact interaction.

This contact-sector centrality is the first categorical gravity obstruction.

Nonseparating sewing

A nonseparating cut tests the wheeled or trace structure. For an endomorphism preserving WW, the category must identify

Tr⁡V(ifp)=Tr⁡W(f),\operatorname{Tr}_V(i f p) = \operatorname{Tr}_W(f),

where i:W→Vi:W\to V and p:V→Wp:V\to W split the idempotent.

This follows formally for a dualizable retract once the surface operations preserve WW. It fails to answer whether the unprojected primitive operations contain off-diagonal maps between WW and its physical complement.

Local metric versus global KLT pairing

The local metric gg controls one-particle trace removal and internal state sums.

The global scalar intersection pairing

IΣ:HΣ⊗HΣˉ→1I_\Sigma: \mathcal H_\Sigma\otimes\mathcal H_{\bar\Sigma} \to\mathbf1

controls the KLT pairing between ordering sectors. At tree level its inverse supplies the KLT kernel.

The full proposed gravity operation is therefore

GRtree=⟨PrimSym⁡g2(YM),PrimSym⁡g2(YM)⟩Iscalar−1.\mathrm{GR}_{\mathrm{tree}} = \left\langle \operatorname{PrimSym}_g^2(\mathrm{YM}), \operatorname{PrimSym}_g^2(\mathrm{YM}) \right\rangle_{I_{\mathrm{scalar}}^{-1}}.

An arbitrary-surface version additionally requires a perfect loop-level scalar intersection matrix and its coevaluation. Current loop inverse-KLT work constructs diagonal surface integrands; off-diagonal entries, their intersection interpretation, closed-curve completion, matrix inversion, and loop double-copy use remain open.

Exact structural question

The gravity problem should be stated as:

Is Sym⁡02E an orthogonal modular retract preserved by every primitive surface operation?\boxed{ \text{Is }\operatorname{Sym}^2_0E \text{ an orthogonal modular retract preserved by every primitive surface operation?} }

This is stronger than closure of generalized cuts and logically independent of searching for a preferred loop integrand representative.

Next falsification tests

  1. List the elementary cut-free generators of the doubled jet surface algebra.
  2. Evaluate (1−P)μP⊗n(1-P)\mu P^{\otimes n} on each generator.
  3. Prove or disprove that the resulting defect is a hereditary contact ideal.
  4. Verify the snake and trace identities for the projected coevaluation.
  5. Separate failures of the local state retract from failures of the global KLT pairing.

Prohibited overclaims

Do not claim that:

Sources

View source on GitHub